reply to post by NavalFC
Actually, from both the first and second article. Nothing was mentioned of a yellow glow. On the first source, all is said that it was a glowing
object.
Now, it might have been a meteorite. But where is the meteorite itself ? More than 6 dives happened and not a single thing was found on the depth,
wreckage or impact hole on the depths.
Let's look through the facts again, a glowing flying object flew over the houses of the eyewitnesses and fell into the river. No one heard anything,
but only saw it crash into the river. Strange that if something that had a force like that, would make no sound breaking through the thick ice.
Next comes the ice and hole itself. A 50 foot in diameter hole, in 1 foot 8 inch thick ice. I don't know physics, but like you said. Something dense
and fast had to have made that hole. But then again, the experts at the scene said there was no evidence that a meteorite had fallen there. No traces
of melted ice near the hole, all they knew something hard and dense crashed there with a huge force.
Finally, where is the meteorite itself ? If it really did fall, and crash through a 50 centimeter thick ice. There would be traces of the meteorite
found on the depths of the river. The river is only 5 meters deep, after crashing through that ice. I would expect it would still be going down with a
substantial speed and would leave a mark on the depths. But, after numerous dives. Not a single thing was found on the depths.