It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Early Dawn UFO-as seen on Coast to Coast, Summer 2006

page: 1

log in


posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 11:25 PM
Hi All,
I just saw this on C2C website. What do you all think of this? This guy says that he sees orbs all the time in his backyard and just happened to catch this UFO in the background while taking it. Think it is legit?

Here is the link to the story:

And here are the photos:

[edit on 9-1-2008 by wrangell76]

[edit on 9-1-2008 by wrangell76]

posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 11:39 PM
Here is a better shot. I got damajikninja to reduce it for me a tad so that it would show up in the ATS threads.

posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 12:30 AM
Weird, that major one is going in an upwards trajectory...If I saw those, I would be intrigued. No idea.

posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 12:42 AM
reply to post by EclipseReloaded

Yeah it is weird. That UFO looks like it is flimsy, able to bend. I have never seen a UFO look like that in the photos of ufo's I have seen in recent years.

posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 02:33 AM
Eh. I certainly have no clue.

But here it is really big.

Also, I used the shadows/highlights on this edit:

OK. Here, I just equalized it using the shadow/highlight edit above:

To my untrained almost looks like the bottom center of the UFO is transparent to the sky.....or erased?

Im no expert...but these photos help me learn to use photoshop for this type of im just using basic adjustments and learning. Probably means nothing. LOL

[edit on 10-1-2008 by greeneyedleo]

[edit on 10-1-2008 by greeneyedleo]

posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 03:07 AM
reply to post by wrangell76

Isnt it obvious? Its a giant Pringles! RUUUUUUUUUUUN!!!

Anyway, its clearly taken with long shutter speed (or he's really shaky, in which case its the same), so I dont trust that this "UFO" looked anywhere close to what it really did that morning. Thus I see no point in analyzing it with blownups.

Edit: Oh and I checked up on the Olympus SP-500UZ. The picture is a disgrace for the camera. 6 megapixels and RAW format. It certainly doesnt show.

[edit on 10-1-2008 by merka]

posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 03:34 AM
reply to post by greeneyedleo

No clue?, well I say outstanding effort. I'm not sure the better image helps at this level, but Ritzman, the (ATS) photo specialist may take a peak pending availability?.

As for my smugness -- not a clue except something video'd by the Russian Military in appx 1995 which they somehow released in Parry and it was very-freaky. Definitely not your average-looking ÜFO".


posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 01:08 PM
Oops, I posted an additional thread to this one. Sorry guys.

This object looks like something ALIVE to me. Like a giant sting-ray or something. Very weird picture.

posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 01:34 PM

Originally posted by EclipseReloaded
Weird, that major one is going in an upwards trajectory...If I saw those, I would be intrigued. No idea.

Its not going upwards, its just an illusion like how shooting stars seemingly go in all directions when in fact they are all following the same path.

posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 06:43 PM
reply to post by DimensionalDetective

Yeah that is what I thought to. It looks biological. Has anyone been able to prove these pics to be legit or not? I am surprised there has not been more response to this thread so far...

posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 06:47 PM
Looks like a flying taco. Are we being invaded by creatures from the planet Taco Bell?

posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 07:36 PM
When I first saw the photo I thought snake or pitcher plant.

Very strange indeed, it's also odd that obviously there was a long shutter time yet that object seems pretty clear and stationary.

posted on Jan, 10 2008 @ 08:10 PM
First thing that stuck out was the streak in front of the tree.

I believe that this image is littered with artifacts. The ones high-lighted in red are clearly in front of the tree or underneath it.

Being that artifact so closely resembles the larger one one the mid of the photo... IMHO this image is motion blurred and contaminated with verifiable artifacting.

With an image such as this any source of light becomes a potential "UFO".
But hey, its just my opinion.

[edit on 10-1-2008 by 1nL1ghtened]

posted on Jan, 13 2008 @ 03:57 PM
mkay, my take on this, that will explain all the things, except the 'organic' UFO.

Seems to me the picture was taken out thru the front window of a moving car. The streaks could be snowflakes illuminated by the flash. This would also explain the reflection in the picture. I say moving car, because the trees that are closest, have the most motionblur, same with the streaks.

I have no idea about that UFO though.. really weird. could be some kind of reflection maybe.

[edit on 13/1/2008 by scarystuff]

new topics

top topics


log in