It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ron Paul Votes Not Counted In New Hampshire District

page: 1
9
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 11:07 AM
link   

Ron Paul Votes Not Counted In New Hampshire District


www.blacklistednews.com

Major allegations of vote fraud in New Hampshire are circulating after Hillary Clinton reversed a mammoth pre-polling deficit to defeat Barack Obama with the aid of Diebold electronic voting machines, while confirmed votes for Ron Paul in the Sutton district were not even counted.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.prisonplanet.com




posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 11:07 AM
link   
So now they are not even counting Ron Paul's votes. What is going on with that? They must really see Ron Paul as a threat IMO. Why else would they say that he received no votes. I find it very hard to believe that he received nopt a single vote.

www.blacklistednews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 11:12 AM
link   
No suprise to me there. We get our usual two-party choice of scum who are nothing more than special interest serving greed-mongers.

Same old song...And the beat goes on.



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 11:19 AM
link   
Here is a link to show that even a non-official poll of sorts, pretty interesting way of doing things, had Ron Paul taking most of the votes in N.H.


This year's contest, which ran Dec. 31 through Sunday, saw Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, capturing 31 percent of the Republican tosses and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., capturing 46 percent of the Democrats. "(Voters) were more in favor of their candidates this time than in the past," Seagren told Fosters Daily Democrat.


Cigar poll



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 11:32 AM
link   
www.prisonplanet.com...

81% of New Hampshire ballots are counted in secret by a private corporation named Diebold Election Systems (now known as “Premier”). The elections run on these machines are programmed by one company, LHS Associates, based in Methuen, MA. We know nothing about the people programming these machines, and we know even less about LHS Associates. We know even less about the secret vote counting software used to tabulate 81% of our ballots. People like to say “but we use paper ballots! They can always be counted by hand!


www.bradblog.com...

As well, a single private company with a very bad record, LHS Associates, Diebold's distributor and technical contractor in New England, runs the elections and controls the vulnerable memory cards for the voting systems across the state. That company has an horrendous record of lax security policies and has admitted to having replaced memory cards, on a whim, on their own, in the middle of past elections.



[edit on 9-1-2008 by Palasheea]

[edit on 9-1-2008 by Palasheea]



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 11:40 AM
link   
So Obama and Ron Paul got stiffed.

If someone can get the Obama camp to start looking at voter fraud and bring Paul into it, the Media might actually cover this seriously. Obama just needs to call up Oprah and attention will be all over this.



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 11:41 AM
link   
reply to post by Palasheea
 


Thanks for the links. Seems that something like this is always going to happen. Now relying on these machines to count votes. I love the lax security measures. Boy, the world seems to be struggling with all types of "security" issues these days.

Good point cobra. If this does get to be serious, I wonder what Oprah will say. Will it turn into a race issue?

[edit on 1/9/2008 by palehorse23]



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 11:54 AM
link   
reply to post by palehorse23
 


If this were such a major issue and voter fraud was being implied, don't you think the site below would be saying something about it?

www.ronpaul2008.com...

Becker

[edit on 9-1-2008 by Becker44]



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 11:56 AM
link   
reply to post by palehorse23
 



This is showing up more and more but not in the MSM (yet).

I feel we all have a responsibility here to make some noise and get some good, old fashioned hand counting done. I encourage all of you in the US (and especially those of us in NH) to call or write not only the NH GOP, but the local news stations (Boston included). We all saw how seriously New Hampshire voters take politics with our state GOP pulling it's support of the FOX news debates, and if we let them know that this kind of creative accounting with our votes will not be tolerated, THEY WILL LISTEN!

Truth be told that this may all be on the up and up and the number problems experienced are merely human error or something less sinister. Unfortunately, in this day and age the American people are more aware of the corruption in our government and for us to demand a recount and explanation is not only necessary but it is our right.

If this matter is swept under the rug and tomorrow comes and we do nothing then the upcoming primaries can (and most likely will) be manipulated. I don't care if you voted for McCain, Obama, or Vermin Supreme. We must have accountability!

The New Hampshire state GOP office can be found at: www.nhgop.org...

The direct email page is at: www.nhgop.org...

I encourage all of you to keep the emails short, sweet, and above all else POLITE!
As was seen last week, the NH GOP is a fair, balanced, and proud group, and by encouraging them to look into these accusations will only benefit all of us.



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 12:15 PM
link   
Sorry folks.

There's an earlier thread on this topic: www.abovetopsecret.com...
.



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 12:16 PM
link   
[edit on 9-1-2008 by Palasheea]



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 12:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Gools
 


Sorry Gools, my thread got moved to this from ATS



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 01:13 PM
link   
I was wondering how long it would take this to start.




posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 02:14 PM
link   
reply to post by palehorse23
 


Of course. How dare they hide 95,000 votes!



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 02:59 PM
link   
Somebody might as well check this out:
www.alexa.com...

I think it speaks pretty well for itself. Ron Paul's website has a traffic rank of 5676. Barack Obama's website has a traffic rank of 13946. Hillary Clinton's website has a traffic rank of 30618. Dramatic statistics. All the elections are corrupted. How disgusting.



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 03:36 PM
link   
So because his site gets a lot of internet traffic that doesn't translate into votes the elections are corrupt? Please.


You may or not realize that visiting a website does not require one to be a registered voter, or even a US citizen for that matter.

This proves nothing except for how far Paul supporters will go in crying foul.



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 04:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by nyk537
This proves nothing except for how far Paul supporters will go in crying foul.


There are certainly more productive things to be doing in support of Dr. Paul. These kinds of comments on conspiracy theories, vote fraud, ect. surrounding the campaign do nothing but turn moderate would-be-voters away. People don't like to align themselves with the "crazies," regardless of the truth or falsity of the theories.

Let's follow our candidate's lead and stick to the issues, yeah? I guarantee you it will do alot more for the cause than crying "vote fraud."


Yeah, I'm talking to you, Alex Jones.


[edit on 1/9/08 by The Axeman]



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 05:38 PM
link   
Also, has anyone seen this video?
edit, I guess you can't embed youtube videos, well, here's the link to it:

www.youtube.com...

Then you can click here boston.com and compare the video and how it differs to the final results.

It might just be a glitch in their website at one point, but i just wanted everyone's opinions.

[edit on 1/9/2008 by Arcane Demesne]

ALSO

spread this website around.

www.ivotedpaul.com...

after you vote in a primary or caucus for Ron Paul, you can sign up at this website, and they will check to see if the votes from that county match up to how much the media 'reports' he gets. This is a good idea IMHO, and more candidates should do this. we need multiple back-up systems.

[edit on 1/9/2008 by Arcane Demesne]



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 06:43 PM
link   
I think it's too early to cry fowl.

Whether the allegations are true, or not. Immediately screaming fraud will only make a campaign look like sore losers.

Keep Ron Paul in the process, and monitor closely.
There needs to be more data samples from other states.
This is probably that first election that is being scrutinized from a number of angles regarding fraud.



posted on Jan, 9 2008 @ 06:51 PM
link   
I dont know what people are talking about "not counting any" of his votes, or saying "he got 0" because I was watching the counting live on the news and they say he got 9%. How is that not counting ? It sounds reasonable , it was just about tied with Guliani for 3rd or 4th place. Thats not bad. . . Especially considering the 'winners' only got around 30 percent so a diff of 1/10 versus 3/10 is not that big a difference. HE still has a chance. Anyone?




top topics



 
9
<<   2 >>

log in

join