It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As of Dec. 28, three months through a scheduled seven-month deployment, the 23 pilots of Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 263, known as VMM-263, had logged 1,639 hours of flight time in Iraq, carried 6,826 passengers and delivered 631,837 pounds of cargo without a mishap or even a close call.
Originally posted by Harlequin
www.military.com...
As of Dec. 28, three months through a scheduled seven-month deployment, the 23 pilots of Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 263, known as VMM-263, had logged 1,639 hours of flight time in Iraq, carried 6,826 passengers and delivered 631,837 pounds of cargo without a mishap or even a close call.
Well there on `General duties` and not really in the line of fire - but for a first tour - they new aircraft , especially after a troubled few years is doing allright out there
But, it's not their job to see that the thing works and the words "adapt, improvise, overcome" have no meaning to them either.
The Bradley fighting vehicle had a lot of growing pains in its development, and an awful lot of critics. It has turned out to be a very good piece of equipment. The Osprey will mature in much the same way.
defently think you need to put that into context. that like saying the F-35 will never be excellent in A2A doesn't mean is sucks donkey butt at both role or just the one. Honestly a quote like that "could" be extremely out of context.
Originally posted by iskander
Once again, and the very test pilot of the Osprey said “as such the Osprey will NEVER be an excellent helicopter or an excellent plane”.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Most of the naysayers of the V-22 are incredibly ignorant of the current state of the craft. It's hard to accept new technology, yet it's easy to believe that technology that doesn't even exist is a constant threat to one's safety, health and well-being.
Personally, I still can't believe that anyone ever thought it would be possible to land airplanes on the deck of a ship and at night, no less.
If I hadn't seen the films, I would have a hard time believing that B-25 bombers could be loaded onto aircraft carriers to carry out air raids on the Japanese mainland.
There are people here who still can't believe that Americans landed on the moon, so it is not much of a stretch to consider that there are those here who will never believe that the V-22 will ever be a viable troop carrier in a combat zone.
But, it's not their job to see that the thing works and the words "adapt, improvise, overcome" have no meaning to them either.
Originally posted by GT100FV
The Bradley fighting vehicle had a lot of growing pains in its development, and an awful lot of critics. It has turned out to be a very good piece of equipment. The Osprey will mature in much the same way.
The aircraft is incapable of autorotation in the case of engine failure, a fact that led a director of the Pentagon's testing office in 2005 to say that if the Osprey loses power while flying like a helicopter below 1,600 feet (490 m) emergency landings "are not likely to be survivable." But Captain Justin (Moon) McKinney, a V-22 pilot, says that this will not be a problem, "We can turn it into a plane and glide it down, just like a C-130".[11] A complete loss of power would require the failure of both engines as a drive shaft connects the nacelles through the wing; one engine can power both propellers.[12]
en.wikipedia.org...
"We can turn it into a plane and glide it down, just like a C-130".[11] A complete loss of power would require the failure of both engines as a drive shaft connects the nacelles through the wing; one engine can power both propellers.
I'll put my faith in the Marine Corps and those whom it comprises.
They will make it work.
People like you are the uninspired Luddites who are nothing more than a side note in the story of the advance of mankind.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Everyone knows that V-22s will crash and that in doing so Marines will die.
Your constant criticisms of the aircraft are nothing more than the ineffectual whining of a kibitzer.
People like you are the uninspired Luddites who are nothing more than a side note in the story of the advance of mankind.
Originally posted by what-lies-beneith
Yup,
And pilots are only allowed to practice this maneuver on simulators and the even then the chances of a survivable landing are doubtful.
It ws only a few years ago the V-22 fleet was grounded for 18 months because of accidents while attempting combat maneuvering. Unless there's been extensive redesign of the flying software and/or control systems of the sircraft, this is still a questionable craft to be flying into combat. Flying a nice predictable glidepath so your V-22 doesn't fall out of the sky is presenting an easy target for anyone on the ground with a combination of MANPADs, light AAA and even RPGs.
[edit on 12-1-2008 by what-lies-beneith]
May I see your credentials, please?
People like you are the uninspired Luddites who are nothing more than a side note in the story of the advance of mankind.