It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by WitnessFromAfar
im sorry but the picture tells us absolutely nothing, if it convinces you thats fine.
Lets agree to disagree on the battle of LA becuase it doesnt even come close to satisfying me and i doubt i will convince you it was nothing. My personal favourite is the 1986 ufo over alaska www.youtube.com... what do you think? this is a toughy even for me to explain.
Originally posted by yeti101
i find it interesting that you are willing to accept any evidence which confirms your alien spaceship theory but completely disreguard anything else.
Originally posted by yeti101
Why in the battle of la do most eye witnesses claim to have seen planes or squadrons of planes in the sky? 1 single witness claims to have seen shells bounce of an object- how far away was this person from the incident i doubt you know and i doubt you care- you only care that its a good quote to confirm your alien spaceship.
Originally posted by yeti101
why are you ignoring the many more people who claimed to have seen planes? do you have an explanation for their testimony. I have put forward my alternative explanation but you havnt.
Originally posted by yeti101
lets be clear tens of thousands of people in LA saw NOTHING that night
Originally posted by yeti101
10+ people on record claiming they saw planes
1 claims they saw a balloon or balloons
Originally posted by yeti101
1 claims they saw a shell bounce of an object, ONE from tens of thousands so either the tens of thousands are wrong or this 1 individual is wrong. whats more likely?
you pick the 1 out of thousands to be accurate becuase thats what you want to believe. I'm willing to look at the big picture and take all versions into account and weigh the possibilities. Whats more objective my method or yours?
Originally posted by yeti101
sorry i never read the rense site, incase you didnt know rense are regarded as one of the worst sources of ufo info on the web. They print so much bunk i'd advise you to avoid it.
Originally posted by yeti101
ive seen alot of stuff over the years on the battle of LA mostly in tv ufo documentaries
Originally posted by yeti101
alot of the plane reports were by people who claimed they seen them during the actual AA fire. You seem to think the planes were a seperate earlier incident? The los angeles Examiner & Herald Examiner both quote such witnesses, if i remember correctly one even said there were 50 planes! does your rense report mention it?
Originally posted by yeti101
The US army knows they had no planes up there during the incident and war records (germany/japan) show no trace of of any operation in 1942 plus nobody from those countries has claimed any operation.
Originally posted by yeti101
do you think there were planes and a ufo there at the same time? why would the witnesses comment on squadrons of planes and not mention a big single object too? how can they miss your UFO and see multiple planes ?
They didn't miss the UFO, it was also reported
Originally posted by yeti101
They didn't miss the UFO, it was also reported
not by the witnesses who are quoted by the la examiner and observer examiner. How could they possibly miss it? there is no mention of a big object during the AA fire by those witnesses. only planes,
did you know a police station even reported a downed plane in the vicinity. turned out to be false. That shows just how bad eye witnesses are during an extreme moment such as an air raid.
[edit on 11-1-2008 by yeti101]
Originally posted by andre18
"What proof will satisfy you?"
Such evidence that Christians would be like…huh…we got it wrong after all……aint that a bitch……and Muslims would be like….wow…so Allah’s three feet tall with big scary eyes…..never saw that coming….
[edit on 14-1-2008 by andre18]
you know as well as I do that Christians will come up with some excuse to include the UFO phenomenon.
Originally posted by yeti101
hi WitnessFromAfar
what you must realise is pro ufo websites will only present one side of the story and include only the details that fit their UFO angle.
Originally posted by yeti101
lets look at the details they decided to ignore.
1. LA observer witness testimony claiming they seen only planes
2. LA examiner witness testimony who also claimed they seen only planes no big single object
Originally posted by yeti101
3. four downed planes were reported to the army one by a police station they all turned out to be false!! thats not a small error
Originally posted by yeti101
4. Army captain who at first claimed to see planes in the sky but quickly identified it as only smoke, he reported nothing else not even the big "obvious" object resnse claims is in the photo.
Originally posted by yeti101
5. some witnesses claim the objects were moving at over 200mph others claim they were moving very slowly almost hovering.
Originally posted by yeti101
if their interpretation of the photo is correct how in the world could anybody NOT see that giant object being lit up? this is a problem for the ufo story. They dont address that issue they just ignore it becuase it doesnt fit their ufo angle.
Originally posted by yeti101
In summary we have completely contradicting accounts from many sources about what was in the sky & falling out the sky that night and we mustn't discount the high anxiety/stress factor invloved in a perceived air raid.. I could construct an arguement that is was a false flag psychological experiment by the government using planes and it would sound just as convincing provided i ignored some of the other diffirent testimony.
if your being truely objective confusion reigns supreme in the witness testimony- i find it just as easy to believe there was nothing in the sky than a ufo that night. So for me its not a very interesting UFO case, you are free of course to draw your own conclusions