posted on Jan, 6 2008 @ 09:54 PM
This is January and I am already tired of the word CHANGE, it seems that both major parties' candidates are wrestling for the title of the bringer of
I have to exclude the GOP candidate Paul & DEM candidate Kucinich from this rant because I have heard their platform and they both qualify for the
category of CHANGE, IMO.
What I am tired of already
is the rest of the field arguing who is really the candidate of CHANGE.
Romney, Giuliani, Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Thompson, Huckabee.....
..."ch ch ch ch changes, tryin to fool the voters, changes".....
It all depends on what the definiton of change is..........
While I am not entirely sold on the fact that a President really changes anything, what do you as a member of Above Politics consider CHANGE?
Is it that we are so diverse on issues that every single one of the candidates can claim this mantra?
I am sure anyone who cares about the path that we take as a country will have their own particular feelings on what constitutes CHANGE.
I am interested in your honest opinions on what CHANGE means to you.