Ok, I had read a lot of the arguments regarding the validity/possibility of the planes in 9/11 being nothing more than hollograms in the following
The arguments supporting the hollogram theory are preposterous to be honest, not just due to the "timing" that controlled explosions would need in
order to make an airplane impression on contact, but also because what seems to be a misunderstanding of how hollograms actually work. Please observe
the following video from the MTV music awards featuring Madonna and the hollographic images of the "Gorillaz"
Some of the things that have to be noted.
1) Hollographic images are not the solid pictures we seem to think they are, they are a 3dimensional image projected via light. Quality of a
hollographic image dissipates and weakens the farther the image is from the light source. Hence why the equipment for these images (which is actually
hidden by the choreographers on the bottom of the podium so that it "looks real") needs to be nearby.
If we are to believe the assumptions that the planes in 9/11 are "hollograms" we are then assuming that this hollographic image is being projected
by miles away. The problem with this theory though, is that the plane is not show from a dissipated state (transparent) to a "solid" state as it
gets closer to its light source. The "images" of the planes remain solid through out the whole video. What I'm simply saying is, we should've been
able to see the plane from a semi-transparent phase, to a "solid image" phase as it got closer to the building (it's "light source")
2) watch the video again, what is it that is different between the segments with the Gorillaz and the segment where it's just madonna and her dancers
at the end? Light! That's right, during the segment with the gorillaz, they have a completely dark background. Why? because if there was light you
would obvisouly be able to see right through these images, but if it's completely dark except for the images, the darkness ends up serving the
purpose of high lighting the "shadows"
Now before anyone critiques on the use of red light during the segment with the rappers and hence make the argument that "they still look solid". I
want you to take a very close look at the hollographic image of the drummer on top. The drums are covered in a glow of red light, and you can actually
see the glow THROUGH the hollographic image of the drummer.
Now think about it for a moment, this was in a very controlled environment where MTV tried their darndest to portray these hollographic images as real
as possible, that's why they went through such lenghts to make it dark for them to look incredibly solid. Now take a look at the way the day was in
9/11, it was day light and it was very darn bright! there is no way those planes could've been hollographic images and look so incredibly solid
during day light. Add to this point #1, dissipation from the light source and you'll see a clearer picture of what it is I mean.
3) The equipment, the equipment needed to create hollographic images is BIG, it is HUGE! it simply is not something that could easily be ignored, in
this video alone they needed a hole group of at least what.... 30-50 choreographers to hide the equipment from the public and make it seem like the
images are real. I simply cannot see how this equipment could've been put into the towers without anyone seeing it or asking questions. Add to that
the fact that someone within the govt. had to be there controlling the equipment before the explosions, and I doubt any govt. criminals would
literally put themselves in the middle of the explosion just to insure the video of the plane keeps rolling.
I'm sorry Mr. Lear, but your theory simply does not hold water
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.