It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by darkbluesky
If your theory is anywhere near approaching the truth, how do you explain your continued safety and ability to present your ideas freely?
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Now they fight that fight by ignoring, marginalizing, and ridiculing us.
As long as the mainstream media continues to follow suit of course they won't see me as a threat.
They know they can be infinitely more effective fighting that battle with neutralization and conitelpro.
AA77 FDR Data, Explained
I gathered up all the publically available flight-data-recorder information, looked at it closely. My initial intent was to properly analyze the data and debunk the variety of dopey conspiracy theories that abounded. After reading all of the NTSB reports, looking carefully at the data provided about the hardware, and the CSV file, I realized that virtually all conspiracy theorist attempts at using this data for sub-second accurate reconstruction is completely and utterly baseless. In the words of Pauli, paraphrased, they aren't even wrong.
What follows is a copy/paste of the bulk of a longer doc file I've been writing. This details, specifically, what flight data recorder data looks like, how it is recorded, how it is decoded, and what the CSV file flying around actually is (and how it was made). I'd really appreciate a proofread and some constructive criticism on any gaps. The full document contains some examples to illustrate teh concepts, but the tables don't translate very well, so I've gotten rid of several examples and paragraphs to do with those examples.
Contained in this document is a pretty thorough description of all the sources for error that pop up when using the CSV file as a "raw" fdr data output, and I explain how the real "fdr" data has few of these problems. I don't actually debunk any specific claims (ie, JDXs), entirely because almost all of the flaws in the analysis are simple and trivial to point out given a thorough understanding of what the CVS file is.
The meat of the paper is section 3. Sections 1 and 2 are scientific background and descriptions of the various technical aspects.
----
About Me:
MS Electrical Engineering, worked with the USAF (as a civilian) on F15s doing data recording and telemetry. I've designed, built, tested, installed, and maintained flight data acquisition systems, of which the FDR is a very low-bit-rate version. It also has the unique characteristic, among data recorders, of being crash survivable.
-------------
forums.randi.org...
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
That quote fails to address a single claim made in our presentation!
Originally posted by Netstriker
What's with the lame music always used in these videos?
It undermines their credibility.
Originally posted by DigItLosseJam
Collin Scoggins is the key to 911. He MUST be on the inside of this thing. Study his actions. Study his lies. There is the solution.
Originally posted by DigItLosseJam
Collin Scoggins is the key to 911. He MUST be on the inside of this thing. Study his actions. Study his lies. There is the solution.