posted on Jan, 6 2008 @ 06:09 AM
I don't want to beat a dead horse here, I do not have photoshop, and I can't see the face close up. Can someone zoom it and maybe post the close up?
I mean its obvious, It was put there by the restoration team, it would have been reported on long before this. I would think though like the above
poster stated that the church would have to authorize a ice cream cone ,or a nasa astronaut to appear on there cathedral. It is a place of God, and
not a graffiti pallete . Why go to all that trouble creating a sculpture then creating a place for him to sit on the leaf, blend that into the
original sculpture, or actually tear out a design piece of the original art?Where is the logic of this? . The worker as well knowing that they could
be removed, and could lose there job possibly. I as a hired artist would not risk my reputation, or waste my time on destroying original artwork by
creating this figure. I would want to finish the job as fast as possible, and move to the next money maker. I do sculpt as well, I would say as an
artist, this piece design, and implementation would take at least 40 hours IMO.
Only thing I can think of that makes sense is that the Church admin wanted it there to draw attention.
I want to also add while I am here, just because someone posts a comment saying it is false is not to be counted on as proof. We do not know the mind,
or motivations of any poster on any website.
[edit on 6-1-2008 by dntwastetime]