 |
reply posted on 19-1-2008 @ 09:27 PM by DogHead
|
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Just occured to me that "single stage to orbit" is not the same as "reusable". I supposed you can have one stage in a rocket and still launch it
(aren't most modern ICBMs this way?).

Von Braun's 1950s vision of near Earth space was one that included what amount to ICBMs going to space stations, emptying in the process, then being
refuelled and sent on their way to the Moon or Mars for eventual breakdown as scrap, with space taxis taking people back down to the Earth. Soon after
that he came up with what amounts to a space shuttle / space taxi and that cool looking nonaerodynamic Mars Mission main spacecraft - the nuclear one
which is spheres stuck together.
ICBMs as quick and dirty spaceships is a great idea for cargo. I think that's what the semi commercial / semi military Athena series is for.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-1-2008 @ 10:13 PM by mikesingh
|
Originally posted by weedwhacker
I obviously have never flown the Shuttle (except a really cool 'sim' at the KSC Visitor's Center...it handled a little bit like a DC-10...) that
tries to recreate the last five minutes or so, follow the HUD in the turn to Final and down the GlideSlope. Fun stuff, that!

Wow! That's cool! Were you on auto P whilst maneuvering into the landing funnel for your finals? Or were you on manual mode? If the latter, who ran
the check lists for you??
Cheers!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-1-2008 @ 11:01 PM by weedwhacker
|
reply to post by mikesingh
Dear mikesingh,
Not sure if you're trying to be sarcastic there, mate...
If you had been a tourist at the KSC in Florida in the mid 1990s you would have seen a bank of four or five 'simulators' to land the Shuttle.
Pretty basic, a joystick, and a CRT. NO! No autopilot, no checklist...you push a button, it lets you loose from a left base, as I recall, and with
VERY basic HUD references you just steer the thing to touchdown. OK, maybe it was originally designed for kids, or for adults who act like kids, but
I found it surprisingly responsive for such a simple program, and quite easy to manage for someone who had a bit of flying experience under his belt.
The 20+ G/S angle was interesting (guessing, in hind sight, they took care of the vertical for you...maybe it only let you work the ailerons)...but I
felt as if I had elevator control as well, following the HUD on the screen.
*edit to add*
A gift for you, mike...another quote from Sir Arthur C. Clarke (sic):
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
[edit on 19-1-2008 by weedwhacker]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 01:13 AM by mikesingh
|
reply to post by weedwhacker
Heck no! Not sarcastic in the least! I just found it interesting and envious at the same time! I would have loved to get into a shuttle sim and
experience the landing! I thought you had the oportunity of getting into the ones that the astronauts use for training.
There's a Shuttle I've tried in the MS flight sim X and that's pretty interesting too! Never got to land that darn thing correctly!  But I'm
gonna keep trying until I get it straight!!
And thanks for AC Clarke's take, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." But that's what some people
don't realize. For them anything out-of-the-box and beyond mainstream scientific paradigms is impossible and plain science fiction!
Cheers!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 01:24 AM by DogHead
|

Like so much Clarke stuff though that nearly worn out quote is great from a distance and less and less sensible the closer you get.
Sufficiently advanced technology might seem like magic but it doesn't remain that way for thinking humans. No matter the gap between the two cultures
the less technological culture always finds a rational system in which to place the "alien" technology they encounter. Sometimes the less tech
people get every single detail wrong and even the underlying basic natural philosophy wrong, but they still quickly place it within a cosmological and
rational system. Even scientism is preferable to decadent credulity. And from scientism many cultures drift or evolve to scientific thought and then
to duplication of the technology.
Anyway, not wanting to rant, I will leave it at that.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-1-2008 @ 07:55 PM by pippadee
|
Or did the space shuttle Atlantis cancel because of near Earth asteroid TU24 due to pass close to Earth on 29 January 2008?
For more info go to neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news157,html
or
www.TU24.org
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-1-2008 @ 12:53 PM by FremenBlueEyes
|
reply to post by johnlear
the blue swallow chases a silver hummingbird. Green finch is held down and all the while gold eagle watches.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 10:49 PM by zorgon
|
Originally posted by tep200377
Whould you please tell us how you know this? 
Simple the emails....
Nah never mind went through all this before...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-2-2008 @ 01:18 AM by Matyas
|
That's a pretty cryptic remark by FBE, I am in the dark on that one. Z, I have sent for help, this is my last post until he is zeroed in on me.
Yeah...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-2-2008 @ 04:28 PM by SpookshowJon
|

I had to giggle when I read even just the headline on this one. Thanks for the smile. And, while I'm not too familiar with Mr. Lear, his work or his
claims, I gotta say I kinda feel sorry for the guy. To live such an ATS-centric life so as to believe that because he started a buzz here on this
topic that it would affect NASA or any top secret government plans. That's just kinda sad don't you think? And if there were secret plans to hook
up with the space station or anything else ... wouldn't they just send one of their top-secret ships that use the UFO tech. or something? 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-2-2008 @ 05:56 PM by zorgon
|

Originally posted by SpookshowJon To live such an ATS-centric life so as to believe that because he started a buzz here on this topic
that it would affect NASA or any top secret government plans. 
Well that 'believe' was founded on reality based on emails and other events that were documented here in other threads... Yes NASA is most
definitely watching us
So I suppose all those secret DoD Missions the shuttle flew even BEFORE the ISS was there are all fiction to? You know the ones where the return
weight was and still is CLASSIFIED?
So just what DID they bring back? And from WHERE?
And seeing as everyone missed the fact that the AF had to scramble to get their secret NRO satellite launched after the postponement... just exactly
what WAS the rush to get it up there so fast? Surely another month or so would not have been critical?
Glad we could amuse you... just keep on sniffing that laughing gas they feed you
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-2-2008 @ 06:00 PM by zorgon
|
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
I have absolutely no doubt that our government has at least an experimental craft that can achieve LEO using a single stage method. 
Now cut that out... you know the rules... no teasing the Lemmings without a few reams of proof and several photos
But feel free to drop by skunk works anytime for a cup of coffee and we can swap 'stories'
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-2-2008 @ 01:35 AM by SpookshowJon
|
Zorgon ... if that is your real name  ... didn't mean to offend. I just find it laughable the things the government can be accused of ... then
hear that a few thousand (at best for this particular forum/topic) ATS posters can miraculously throw off the governments big secret agenda ... based
on some emails and such?
Look my friend, I believe a lot of things I read ... especially on here where facts are actually proven ... but this one ... to me ... it's just
absurd. Mr. Lear may be "famous" here on this site and a few more like it ... a couple million people around the world might know his name ... but
even if he had access to every secret the government had to give up ... he wouldn't be able to affect anyone of them in any way ... as much as I
myself might wish it otherwise. We just are not that important. Maybe someday we will, but proclaiming things like this are just self defeating to
the entire cause of truth. IMHO this honestly sounds as far out as I have seen on ATS ... and we all now how far out that is.
As a believer in many things ... an ATS reader many years ... later, a member ... and someone unfamiliar with Mr. Lear, I plan to learn a little more
in the near future. Until then, this believer just doen't believe it. The hype is self made and that's not a good thing.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-2-2008 @ 02:11 AM by zorgon
|
Originally posted by SpookshowJon
Zorgon ... if that is your real name  ... 
Well... it is in some circles
didn't mean to offend. 
None taken
ATS posters can miraculously throw off the governments big secret agenda ... based on some emails and such? 
Perhaps just a slight change in plans based on 'public opinion'
 but proclaiming things like this are just self defeating to the entire cause of truth. 
Well perhaps you could point me to some true soldiers in this cause of truth, because quite frankly I do not see any... I myself am on a quest for
answers... pretty much have discovered that absolute truth doesn't exist and is merely relative to our frame of reference...
Perhaps "The Secret" is right and we influence the matrix more than we thik
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-2-2008 @ 06:48 AM by coven
|
reply to post by zorgon
Hey... Tell john we need him dammit. This is stupid. He doesn't have to be a CM but he needs to at least check in on us once every coupla weeks.
Hell... we may turn into planet of the apes without 'im. *glares at doghead  *
Coven
(yes i know... I know, off topic... but dammit I just found out about John leaving.)
BOOOO
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-2-2008 @ 01:46 AM by zorgon
|
Originally posted by coven
Hey... Tell john we need him dammit. This is stupid.

Yeah especially now that NOVA is "singing our song" on "Secret Astronauts"
www.abovetopsecret.com...
And you can tell John yourself... his email is here
www.thelivingmoon.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 02:14 PM by johnnylightning06
|
space shuttles and all of the modern space travel equipment that the public knows about is a joke.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-5-2008 @ 01:45 PM by menguard
|
There are many things that go amiss when you HIGHLIGHT what they are doing, then it isolates worldwide attention on what dark missions are going down
without mankinds knowing.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |