Did the Space Shuttle Atlantis Cancel Because of the Scrutiny Generated on ATS?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 17 times


reply posted on 6-1-2008 @ 04:04 PM by ukmicky1980
reply to post by snoopyuk



Hi Snoopy, I dont think its the fact that the UK needs America's permission to be in space, the truth is we need the Americans help to get our stuff up there, along with the help of ESA




reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 10:08 AM by COOL HAND
reply to post by IgnoreTheFacts




If anything was posted here that was not supposed to be, what makes you think that its true? There is no way to verify it other than to take someone at their word.

I think the fact that no one here has "disappeared" leads me to believe that nothing has been revealed that is actually true. If someone here actually revealed a truth (with proof) I am sure the folks that are behind that truth would not have any problems silencing that person one way or another.

But, that is just my opinion.


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 10:12 AM by antar
reply to post by PPLwakeUP



Interesting point to consider. I wonder if it possible that they are doubling up the shuttle flights to carry the alien technology needed from area 51 and the likes in to keep the astronauts on the secret space station safe from the harmful and deadly effects of this next catastrophic solar event? Or do you suppose it is just to keep the equipment from getting fried? Either way, they will have to plan on shuttling the space station personnel to the real base very soon as this cycle has begun a few months earlier than expected.



reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 10:49 AM by IgnoreTheFacts
reply to post by Ben Miller



Your a little overly sensitive, don't you think? Ever hang out with your buds? You guys ever jab each other or call each other names? Or do you talk like your posting an internet bulletin board where you have to "pretend" to be politically correct all the time?

*SNIP*



[Mod Note: Please address the post and NOT fellow members' character or person]
NEW: Civility and Decorum are Required

[edit on 7-1-2008 by 12m8keall2c]


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 11:03 AM by OptionToChoose
reply to post by COOL HAND



I think the fact that no one here has "disappeared" leads me to believe that nothing has been revealed that is actually true.

Which could, in some ways, apply to the entire ATS website. Why is it still here, unless not one single conspiratorial statement which has ever been made here is true? Why hasn't whatever it is that destroys dissenters attacked here? Is the site protected by God?
__________________________________________________________________________

Here is a fact I would like not to be ignored: when I first started visiting ATS around '03, I came prepared to weed through the BS, with a bit of pre-acquired knowledge under my belt, and since then I have been able to fine-tune my own understanding of how bizarre this Universe really is, at least as much as my small mind can comprehend at this time. How can there be a strong conspiracy site without clowns meandering among the true seekers? . . as mentioned, I'm prepared for that. But I am basically fringe all the way, so over-the-top statements don't trouble me in the least. I'm a person who lives by faith, and studies the intricacies of science ... I believe you can't have one without the other, at least not effectively. In my personal life I predict things based on gut-feeling, and into the 90-percentile range they actually bear out. This is true whether I said it here or not, and the point is, when I see a respected, accomplished figure make wild statements, my first question is, "why did he just say that?" and I want to learn more.

Since I already don't know the answer to whatever question-of-the-moment I'm seeking, "so-and-so is crazy, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah" with no counter-proof of it becomes almost overwhelmingly annoying to me in my quest. I'm not here for that. Can you prove that John is wrong? No, you simply start shooting tennis balls at him, perhaps hoping he will shut up? . . . ?? Instead, he continues to freely speak, on a free-speech forum, in a country which used to be a model for speaking freely.

So until the skeptics lay out the proof that JL is wrong (and I will be glad to consider that, too) or I find it out myself, I will continue to listen.

Thank you for your time.


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 12:07 PM by defuntion
Originally posted by Extralien
If you've never seen this film 'UFO-The Secret NASA Transmissions. The Smoking Gun(2004)'
Heres a small clip;
www.youtube.com...


Did you watch this video all the way to the end?
It seems they tacked on a video of BLOOD PLATELETS under microscope.
not sure what the object is that is supposed to be the tether...
Also, note at the top-left of the video "OPIL" look up the acronym.
The other objects in the actual NASA footage look like satelites whizzing by to me.
Cool vid anyway.
Sorry for the off-topic post.


[edit on 7-1-2008 by defuntion]


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 12:31 PM by buddhasystem
Originally posted by johnlear
I don't use the word NAZI.


You don't? How about this brilliant statement of yours:

The cover up of the real Venus didn't start until the early 1960's when the NAZTY NAZA NAZI'S took full control of the space program and all information within it.


located at
www.abovetopsecret.com...? Or this one:

Thanks for the posts ITF. Most if not all current instrumentation in Nazty NAZA NAZI's spacecraft is falsified



Did you just lie or is your memory selective or short?

I use the word NAZA which I feel is more descriptive of NAZA's background and history but more acurately describes NAZA's current profiles, missions and plans.


This is innuendo became old a few months ago. NASA's plans and missions aligned with Nazi's plans?

And you are demanding common courtesy?

But thanks for your suggestion, it was taken into consideration and evaluated with great care.


You won't. Just another one of your smirks.

Thanks for the post.


You, too.


[edit on 7-1-2008 by buddhasystem]


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 12:42 PM by eyewitness86
John Lear:

You mentioned earlier that the black triangles could not go into orbit. Please explain why. I do not doubt it necessarily; I and a witness observed very close up a massive black triangle years ago. I have described that encounter elsewhere on ATS and will not rehash it now, but I am quite curious as to why they are atmospheric ( I assume that is what you meant ) vehicles when they obviously run on anti-grav.

What limits them from space flight? You are right that not many are seen out of the atmosphere: I had not really thought about that aspect before, but it makes sense in a way. Not all anti-grav ships necessarily would have the capabilities of space flight: Their missions might be transport or other uses here closer to earth, or as I believe, that they are being used now as a means of noting how many people see them, how they react, etc. No doubt the people responsible for these things take close note of reactions to their appearance. Especially when they slowly come directly over people 250 to 300 feet up, totally silent, drifting along at a walkiong speed..and then rising and turning cartwheels into the sky!! It gets the attention pretty fast!!

Please tell us as much as you know, or can , about the back triangles: as a witness I have a real interest in them and I know many others do as well. Are there fleets of them?Purpose now and future? Country of origin if human? Any alien ships with the same configurations? Any info much appreciated.


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 01:03 PM by Extralien
reply to post by defuntion



You're welcome and it's not off topic.

I've posted the sample of this video because of what happened after it was aired at conferences and became available on video.

The man being interviewed used to/still does work for a TV station and as a hobby he intercepted NASA's live video links to Earth. After he realised what he'd got, he made the documentary.

It's quite long as he goes in depth about it all and the footage is pretty damned good. There's a lot of him talking, but if you can put up with that it is worth seeing.

Anyway, After this was made public, NASA made changes to their live links as I said in the previous post. So this is one good example of what they do to stop people being informed and how they take note on who says/does what.

Do try to get the full video.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 69 replies
Official Maine Caucus Results Thread!!
  2012 US Elections, Posted 6 hours ago, 57 replies