reply to post by favouriteslave
What this site shows is that not everyone is in agreement with climatic predictions. That's not so unusual in science.
If their models don’t match the data, they don’t change their models – they fiddle with the data.
That seems like a fairly strong statement, but is it? A typical model for climate is the GCM or global circulation model. This model takes in many
inputs. Instead of tossing out the model adjustments are made to the data so that some of the issues are considered more or less important. That keeps
the model which appears to be useful and so-called fiddles with the data. Models are kept and rejected based on their ability to make predictions.
For the past decade the magnetic field that triggers sunspots, magnetic storms on the face of the Sun, has been steadily declining and, with
it, so has the overall temperature of planet Earth.
Magnetic reversals of the sun are common.
Ulysses and the Reversal of the Solar Magnetic Field
It is during this time of maximum activity, every 11 years, that the solar magnetic field undergoes a reversal. The reversal is not
instantaneous, but involves a complex restructuring of the magnetic field which appears to take at least several months
My friend, Robert Felix, author of “Not by Fire, but by Ice”, and editor of IceAgeNow.com, probably knows more about ice ages than anyone
on the planet. In his book, he says “Ice ages begin and end abruptly every 11,500 years.” Guess what? We are now 11,500 years since the last Ice
Age ended!
That's a weird claim that this guy knows so much about ice ages since he does not appear to have a background in the subject. He was an architect.
Here is an article pointing out how information on the internet gets distorted and spreads quickly.
On David Bellamy's Climate Myth, and the Tenacity of Memes
Read this article and see that Felix has copied information from a magazine run by Lyndon LaRouche.