It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Spets
By the way, if you wanna get into F*cked up, here's something for ya; the soviet army lost 20,000 men in afgan in 15 years while the US lost 50,000 in 20 in vietnam.
Originally posted by snipermeister
Americans might boast but think to hostage situations ie planes with terrorists on board ,delta have a bad track record on those
also the sas in afghanistan have been there for years blending in with tribes learning customs, lingo etc which delta does not do.
Somarlia is a example on what not to do getting bitch slapped by children is not good for moral.My uncle who was in army for 20 years and served in the sas for some of it told me he and his troop were more worried that americans were too trigger happy and shot at every thing that moved and they might get killed by friendly fire.
He did say the green berets were top class soldiers and not prone to boasting to every one how hard and tough they were unlike delta and seals.
Originally posted by rogue1
LOL, I love how people lways make this comaprison. The US was fighting a very well trained and eqippped army of millions of men. The Soviets were fighting a ragtag bunch of guerillas who were poorly equipped, with barely a tree to hide under. Yet they still lost 15 000 men
Originally posted by maloy
Originally posted by rogue1
LOL, I love how people lways make this comaprison. The US was fighting a very well trained and eqippped army of millions of men. The Soviets were fighting a ragtag bunch of guerillas who were poorly equipped, with barely a tree to hide under. Yet they still lost 15 000 men
The Vietnamese were not far better equipped than Afganise, nor were that better trained. In both instances the opposing superpower trained and equipped the rebels. In both cases the rebels were fighting in there homeland, with better knowledge of terrain and geography. Not much is known about Russian war in Afganistan (as opposed to War in Vietnam). However the statistics I heard was that for every Russian soldier, about 70 Afganese were killed. I do not know if this includes the civilians or not, but this makes alot of dead mujahedeen. It is true that it is not correct to say that Russia was anymore successful in Afganistan than US in Vietnam. Both nations lost the wars, but unlike US, Russia learned its lesson.
Originally posted by Liamoville
Spot on
In my opinion the SAS is the best and unmatched, in fact havent the SAS trained alot of the Worlds Special Forces units ?
Originally posted by maloy
Originally posted by rogue1
LOL, I love how people lways make this comaprison. The US was fighting a very well trained and eqippped army of millions of men. The Soviets were fighting a ragtag bunch of guerillas who were poorly equipped, with barely a tree to hide under. Yet they still lost 15 000 men
The Vietnamese were not far better equipped than Afganise, nor were that better trained. In both instances the opposing superpower trained and equipped the rebels. In both cases the rebels were fighting in there homeland, with better knowledge of terrain and geography. Not much is known about Russian war in Afganistan (as opposed to War in Vietnam).
However the statistics I heard was that for every Russian soldier, about 70 Afganese were killed. I do not know if this includes the civilians or not, but this makes alot of dead mujahedeen. It is true that it is not correct to say that Russia was anymore successful in Afganistan than US in Vietnam. Both nations lost the wars, but unlike US, Russia learned its lesson.
Originally posted by Liamoville
In my opinion the SAS is the best and unmatched, in fact havent the SAS trained alot of the Worlds Special Forces units ?
Originally posted by ludaChris
THe thing I feel makes HRT the best rescue team in the world is that they are not soldiers, but are policemen whose goal is always to save lives,
Originally posted by rogue1
Maybe a few 3rd world counreies but not nations like the US or Australia. This is a myth perpetuated by the ignorant. IN fact the Australian SASR has far more capability than the SAS and far more diverse roles, as evidenced in Afghanistan.
Originally posted by rogue1
Originally posted by Spets
By the way, if you wanna get into F*cked up, here's something for ya; the soviet army lost 20,000 men in afgan in 15 years while the US lost 50,000 in 20 in vietnam.
LOL, I love how people lways make this comaprison. The US was fighting a very well trained and eqippped army of millions of men. The Soviets were fighting a ragtag bunch of guerillas who were poorly equipped, with barely a tree to hide under. Yet they still lost 15 000 men
Originally posted by Dyno25000
Groan...not THIS subject again. Mad Scientist, you really, really need to access the "Search" function kindly provided by your ATS Moderators.
This has been bandied about at least a dozen times since I've been here in the past year, and the concensus is that US Army Special Forces ("The Green Berets") are THE finest special operations outfit in the whole world.I know this to be true.
Originally posted by Dyno25000
Groan...not THIS subject again. Mad Scientist, you really, really need to access the "Search" function kindly provided by your ATS Moderators.
This has been bandied about at least a dozen times since I've been here in the past year, and the concensus is that US Army Special Forces ("The Green Berets") are THE finest special operations outfit in the whole world.I know this to be true.