posted on Jan, 3 2008 @ 07:10 PM
I don't mean to sound condescending but that video I saw
leads me to believe that he was asked by House Speaker (FL)
Tom Feeney to write a software program that rigged the
election on a Diebold Election Machine. However he did not
state that he was asked to use it in the election results.
But the most horrific incriminating evidence I saw was that
Tom Feeney even asked him to write this software in the first
place is evidence enough for me that the election was rigged
since the election results ended in the 51% to 49% scenario
that he wrote into the program. I guess that means that Bush
really isn't our elected President after all. That is why they couldn't
make the paper ballots match up to the electronic results in the
multiple paper recounts.
Very interesting video, thanks for posting:
starred and flagged