posted on Feb, 10 2004 @ 10:39 AM
What if people tried to differentiate between good evidence reported by named, real multiple witnesses and supported by real physical data vs.
fanciful stories stories told by disinformation agents and wacko individuals posting anonymously on the internet?
Not that you are necessarily in the second category, razorbackhater, but this bizarre story about Iraq seems to have been designed specifically to
drum up support for the invasion of Iraq, its targeted audience being conspiracy theorists. It probably started as a perverse joke by war supporters
with an axe to grind against war critics.
[Edited on 10-2-2004 by Condorcet]