It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Before, in the past, our nation would attack other more powerful nations, and would send people off to war, without any given reason
...but, the government isn't doing the same experiments on civilians, because of the freedom of information act papers that were once classified information have been released to the public and we can see what the government has done,...
We are better off fighting Al-quaeda than we are with fighting a government like the Soviet Union.
So, we don't have to worry about them mobilizing, all we have to do, is to contain them
I don't get why people are hating on Bush. I understand that Bush has made silly mistakes, but, he isn't as bad as those other guys, like, look at his father. His father was basically an NWO spokesperson, and Bush, isn't even speaking about the NWO
Clearly not. But, with Bush in office, Bush has managed to stall the government's efforts on manifest destiny to a NWO by means of the war in Iraq. The war in Iraq has preoccupied the government's foreign policy and now we face an enemy in Iraq that we didn't foresee and we're figuring out how to deal with the enemy. In other nations around the world, Al-quaeada isn't as successful as they are in Iraq. That's why they are easier to contain. That's why I think they are easier to contain, mainly, because, they don't have the same power that the Soviets had.
Originally posted by Maverickhunter
reply to post by forestlady
Do you have any actual reason to disagree with me or are you disagreeing with me because other people in the thread are disagreeing with me and you don't know why so you assume that I am on drugs?
While there have been confrontations with us and other governments in the past we have had different actions taken with this President than more other Presidents. Other Presidents were far more evil than Bush.
Look at Bill Clinton, I don't care if I am insulting anyone by saying that the President that everyone likes is bad, but, I mean, when he was around he deceived a lot of people into thinking world peace was possible.
That sounds like an NWO objective to me. Is George W Bush doing that? Clearly not.
But, with Bush in office, Bush has managed to stall the government's efforts on manifest destiny to a NWO by means of the war in Iraq.
The war in Iraq has preoccupied the government's foreign policy and now we face an enemy in Iraq that we didn't foresee and we're figuring out how to deal with the enemy.
In other nations around the world, Al-quaeada isn't as successful as they are in Iraq. That's why they are easier to contain.
Imagine if the terrorists acquired the same nuclear weapons technology of the Soviets and or the Russians of today. We would be brought down to our knees and fall and the world would be at peril.
More of our problems with this enemy doesn't lie within combat it relies on intelligence.
We've prevented major attacks on our home soil from ocurring again since the incident on 9-11 and that's something we have to be proud of ourself for.
If Bush really is that evil, and Bush is behind 9-11, and Bush did terrorism, and Bush is working with the terrorists, making psychological experiments at Guantanamo bay, and, like, all of those other places, don't you think we would have heard about different special projects like we have from other Presidents in the past?
There is still a load of information that we can find on the FOIA that's not related to different Presidents. Like for instance, we can find out what a government agency is up to through a document search on the FOIA.
People can say all they want, that other Presidents before weren't as bad,
and Bush has done more evil acts with limiting our freedom for favor of security, and crap like that.
Bush is more prone to making mistakes than actually initializing bills into law that make it so obvious that we are moving to facism.
The reason George W Bush hasn't implimented the same policies that his father did are because George W Bush has a lot of opposition to him,
and, so, Bush had to change his ways a bit, since now Democrats are in charge of Congress, things are different.
Bush isn't as evil as other Presidents.
The gulf war II is only one war, and,
Bush is only there because of the UN, so it isn't a question as to why we went to war, and it wasn't our President's fault, and the UN probably would have went there on the basis that Iraq was refusing to comply with them anyways.
Bush is very interesting to discuss from different points of view My opinion on the matter is that Bush isn't evil, he's misguided, therefore our government isn't evil, it's misguided as well.
Would you rather have a misguided idiot like Bush as President or someone that's able to implement their policies even if people disagree with them/hate them?