It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by enigmania
reply to post by Bunch
If you think that the official story makes the most sense, than you must not have reviewed all the info that's out there, for instance:
Al Quada: was formed and funded by the CIA in the 80's to fight the Russians in Afghanistan, Bin Laden is, and always has been a CIA operative.
The planes: I think that year, up to 911, jet fighters were scrambled to intercept airliners that went off course, or didn't respond, over 80 times. You think, that on that day, the biggest militairy might in the world, would let 4 planes slip through their defenses, and fly directly towards the political and financial centres off the country, without their knowledge. Don't be naive.
ldings: you don't want to talk about it, but there lies a big chunk off the evidence. Forget the towers, what happened to building 7? It wasn't hit by a plane or debree, there was only a small fire, yet it collapsed. A classic demolition, if you see the footage.
a coincidence that all the stock exchange information was stored there. Billions of dollars were made by selling stock with fore-knowledge, just before 911, like stock in aviation companies. Nothing could be traced back afterwards. The evidence and reports in the Enron affaire conveniently dissapeared with the building to.
go on for hours and hours.
Sure there are a lot of wild theories out there, mainly to confuse people, you have to filter through all the garbage.
Originally posted by Taxi-Driver
Originally posted by enigmania
reply to [url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread324235/pg1#pid3852820]p
When was the last time a jetliner was hijacked in the continental US? How long were the planes KNOWN to have been hijacked before they impacted? Ask yourself these questions. Then imagine trying to arm, scramble, identify, and intercept this aircraft in the timeframe we know is fact. You will not find another example of this happening. To think it was happening "without their knowledge" is naive. To think that there was a precidented opportunity, looking at the time constraints, to stop the jetliners from hitting their targets is naive. ( the only exception is flt 93)
So what are you saying? That flight 93 was shot down? Cause you if you do,
you contradict the official story yourself, since it never admits to that.
ldings: you don't want to talk about it, but there lies a big chunk off the evidence. Forget the towers, what happened to building 7? It wasn't hit by a plane or debree, there was only a small fire, yet it collapsed. A classic demolition, if you see the footage.
I am sorry, you are horribly misinformed.
What, are you saying it was hit by a plane, that there wasn't a small fire and that it didn't collapse, looking like a controlled demolition?
a coincidence that all the stock exchange information was stored there. Billions of dollars were made by selling stock with fore-knowledge, just before 911, like stock in aviation companies. Nothing could be traced back afterwards. The evidence and reports in the Enron affaire conveniently dissapeared with the building to.
Wow, you should probably find some sources to cross-reference your information.
Why? It's common knowledge that exchange markets' watchdog was located in building 7. People can look it up themselves if they want.
go on for hours and hours.
Sure there are a lot of wild theories out there, mainly to confuse people, you have to filter through all the garbage.
I find this quite ironic....I thought those above points WERE the garbage, easily debunked years ago.
You are entitled to your thoughts, I don't see any of them debunked.
I must admit I wopuldhave to dig first to come up with the CIA/Al Quaida information right now, I do know for sure that Bin Laden has always worked for America since the 80's.
Edit; I made a bit of a mess with this post, sorry. Can anyone explain to me how to qoute different pieces of a post, by u2u, thnx.
[edit on 2/1/08 by enigmania]
[edit on 2/1/08 by enigmania]
Originally posted by OrionStars
Flight simulators are like playing at video arcarde. Any movement to simulate flight is hardly enough to prepare someone to immediately be capable of flying any actual commercial jetliner.
Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
Hmmm
Perhaps another angle:
Why if you believe the official story, would you bother to come onto a conspiracy site to begin with?
I believe it is your subconciousnesses that have bought you here. A minghty powerful tool it is.
watchZEITGEISTnow