It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jfj123
I think he means the conspiracy you are referring to. The fact that the government is covering up "something". This would make them complicit.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Originally posted by jfj123
You'll notice that almost everyone in, around or near must be involved in the conspiracy if ultima is right Thats a lot of real quiet people
I have stated such in as theses conspiracies grow so does the branches of all who would need to be involved and the exponentially difficulty level ever increasing to pull it off.
It is kind of like the NWO as in if you are not on their side already in the know then you are part of a very small minority left in the world.
Originally posted by OrionStars
reply to post by ULTIMA1
I am not surprised. Because no one has any photos or videos of any 757 actually impacting and going through the Pentagon and rings as reported in any "official" reports. But did you not find the entire article and the photos highly interesting, in comparison to the "official" reports claiming what they cannot prove, and never intended to prove to substantiate the Bush administration's case?
If the fire was caused by jet fuel, then why were firefighters spraying water?
Why are there unbroken windows so close to the point of impact?
Originally posted by OrionStars
You jump off to water use on oil based fuel fires and agree it should be used. Why?
You jump into "High velocity fog" whatever that is.
A fog nozzle is a firefighting hose nozzle that breaks the water that flows through it into tiny droplets of water. The theory is that small droplets of water create more surface area than a solid stream created by a smooth bore nozzle. The water adsorbs the heat, turns into steam, and displaces the oxygen, smothering the fire. With the increase of surface area, this job is done quicker.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Well I understand wetting everything down to prevent spreading of fire. But putting out jet fuel fires out with water? Never happen.
Originally posted by OrionStars
reply to post by jfj123
Are you saying 767s are flown by remote control?
Other than that, why are pilots paid the big bucks if 767s are so "fully automated"? The airlines could save a great deal of money allowing the planes to fly themselves.
Regardless, of what others have stated, flight simulators in no way replace the actual conditions of flying or driving. That is why they are called virtual reality simulators.
Originally posted by OrionStars
reply to post by Bunch
Where is the evidece that proves any planes actually hit anything? Huge fireballs and smoke blocking everyone's vision is not proof any planes hit anything.
I can see where people would think that happened, considering they say they saw planes headed in that direction. However, there is not enough physical evidential proof stating that is what actually happened. There is no physcial evidence any passengers or luggage were on any planes alleged to have impacted anything.
If people want us to believe passengers were on any alleged planes, then please provide enough physical evidence, which proves that beyond a reasonable doubt. Passenger lists are no proof. The only proof of questioning families is alleged passengers' families swear they believe their loved ones are deceased due to airplane crashes.
How many funerals for alleged airplane passengers actually took place? Or were they memorial services instead? Memorial services normally mean the deceased was declared dead but body or remains never found and returned.
If it were me, in the case of 9/11, and someone showed up at my door with unrecognizable remains, I would ask how I know that is my loved one. I would insist on testing at the lab of my choice, to ensure I am actually accepting the remains of my loved one(s), and not someone else's loved one or Bambi's mother etc.