Yep-It's been discussed numerous times. It's definitely a female. The more I see that footage, particularly with the muscle enhancements and some of the recent facial details that were on History channels Monster Quest, the more I'm leaning towards that film footage being the real deal of an actual sasquatch. The female mammaries, the thigh muscles flexing and contracting, the weird gait that I have yet to see any human be able to duplicate, and the latest enhancement on the aforementioned TV program where you can see the creatures mouth opening, and its top lip appears substantially low down from its nose (like a chimpanzee) make me lean towards this being an actual Bigfoot.

I am not sure I have seen this before, can you please provide a working link

Ahhh that old famous video. Yes, I do see breasts. Thats the first time i have seen it enhanced. I would have to say it is a female (if its real)

Also, the 'bigfoot' being a female also adds credence that it might not be a hoax. I would think that adding breasts to a monkey suit would be the last thing a hoaxer would do.

Well it COULD be a poorly trained male too. I mean look at the size of that thing. Its hardly swinging in trees to work out and its obvious not doing much running. Maybe there's a reason why Bigfoot is mainly sighted in America?

'Patty' as she is known, is the famous Bigfoot in the Patterson film. Yes, she was a female and Patterson is responsible for declaring that

People are often lead to believe that Bigfoot is a he, and that there is one of him. Obviously, real species don't operate that way. There are males and females, and a breeding population. Patty was most definitely a female.

Males have been reported to be as tall as 12 feet. In the film, Patty is about 6'7'' (am I correct?). Imagine for a moment if Patterson had caught a male on film? It would have been impossible for people to see an animal that large and declare it to be a hoax. Thankfully, we have Patties muscle tissue movement and swinging breasts to confirm that she wasn't a man in a suit either.

Still the single best piece of evidence for the existence of Sassy, despite the many hucksters who claim to have debunked it.

I have always thought that why would a hoaxer go to the extra expense and complexity of adding pronounced breasts to a suit? All the monkey suits, commercial and custom made, are always invariably 'male'. This aspect just doesn't add up for me. For me, there's a more than 50% chance it's genuine.

Paul in UK

That is Chewbacca's love interest. Makes one wonder who came up with the Chewbacca character!

Truth is stranger than fiction.

Peace to all.

Yup, that's a female buttock if I ever saw one!

I have always felt from the moment I viewed the film in the 70's that this was a female. Did the OP ever wonder why they refer to her as "Patty"?

I think this is fake.

The fur (thick hair) covered breasts actually add more weight to fake IMO. Along with the plastic looking soles of the feet...

if it was a female, instead of calmly walking into the woods, she probably would have turned around and started arguing with patterson

j/k

I remember discussing this years and years ago, it's probably the best evidence for the film being genuine, but it certainly isn't proof of it