It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Queens Speech 2007 (Queen Shapeshifter)

page: 2
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 2 2008 @ 01:22 PM
link   
reply to post by SaviorComplex
 


Was it that obvious?

I have to get better at this denymytrueidentity thingy. It isn't easy wearing all this latex you know? Itches like heck.

Looks great on YouTube, though.




posted on Jan, 2 2008 @ 01:23 PM
link   
Has CanadianVandal analyzed this yet?

If so, inform me!



posted on Jan, 2 2008 @ 01:35 PM
link   
reply to post by thebeliever81
 


where did all this shapeshifting talk originate, even David Icke admits he has no evidence of it, only hearsay, I certainly didn't notice any "shapeshifting".



posted on Jan, 2 2008 @ 01:35 PM
link   
reply to post by thebeliever81
 


where did all this shapeshifting talk originate, even David Icke admits he has no evidence of it, only hearsay, I certainly didn't notice any "shapeshifting".



posted on Jan, 3 2008 @ 05:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by thebeliever81
Look at 2:36 and tell me the queen is not shifting! watch her eyes turn into slits


oh no you can actually see the whites of her eyes for a few seconds through the crappy format/resolution that is you tube, she MUST be a reptilian.

-Now who was the guy who used to always put these threads up? Forgot his name, haven't seen him in a while.

He did it so much that he got ALL reptilian related info moved to the skunkworks forums from the Alien forums for good.

I can't think of his name right n0w, but his dissapearance strangly coincides with your appearance Believer81.



posted on Jan, 3 2008 @ 05:47 AM
link   
I'm fortunate enough to have met Her Majesty the Queen on two occasions. Trust me, she's extremely real, extremely human and there's absolutely nothing reptilian about her.

There you are - real eyewitness evidence in an ATS reptilian thread. For the case against, admittedly, but that's the way the cookie crumbles!

LW



posted on Jan, 3 2008 @ 07:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by LoneWeasel
I'm fortunate enough to have met Her Majesty the Queen on two occasions. Trust me, she's extremely real, extremely human and there's absolutely nothing reptilian about her.


LoneWeasel, you have either been brainwashed by the reptilians, met a human-look-alike, or are a disinformation agent working for the Conspiracy. Now which is it?



posted on Jan, 3 2008 @ 07:18 AM
link   
reply to post by thebeliever81
 


Dude you are obsessed with reptilians. You posted on my thread about my UFO photo and straight up said it was a reptilian ship with an AG propulsion system between two dimensions... that might sound a bit crazy to some people without any evidence to back it up.

Even if her majesty was one, do you seriously believe that she would do it on national television when addressing the entire nation? Come on.. Reptilians.. of all of the conspiracies on here are probably the least likely to be true. I've met the queen and princess ann, neither of them seem very reptilian to me.

Anyway I thought the reptilians lived underground in this 'ere hollow Earth? Why would they need interstellar ships?



posted on Jan, 3 2008 @ 08:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by SaviorComplex

Originally posted by LoneWeasel
I'm fortunate enough to have met Her Majesty the Queen on two occasions. Trust me, she's extremely real, extremely human and there's absolutely nothing reptilian about her.


LoneWeasel, you have either been brainwashed by the reptilians, met a human-look-alike, or are a disinformation agent working for the Conspiracy. Now which is it?


Curses! I can't believe I let my guard slip so easily...now the secret's out...

She was very nice to me the first time. I was quite small and I had a cut on my face from playing football. She didn't mention it.

The second time she resolutely ignored my fixed grin and talked stoically to the person in front of me.

LW



posted on Apr, 8 2010 @ 11:11 AM
link   
I'm afraid it's very refutable.

When you record an image on film, whether it's a still camera or a tv camera, the light passes through the lenses and burns an image on the film.

When you digitally record an image, again either on digital still camera or video, the image is stored as a grid of coloured dots, or pixels. Depending on the resolution of the image, those dots may be easily seen by the eye, or require zooming on on the image.

When you transfer film footage to a digital medium, you loose resolution. That smooth image you got on film has to be digitized, and converted into dots.

Compressing that footage onto flv, or any other digital format, involves a recalculation of those little dots, and there is again another loss in resolution quality. Compression reduces the resolution to in turn reduce the size of the file, making it faster to stream. To do this, the compression software would take, for example, a grid of 9 pixels, 3x3, work out the predominant colour, and then reduce those 9 pixels down to 1 single pixel.

Anyone who's watched a digital version of a video will have seen this, especially on you tube. I've watched episodes of star trek where captain picard suddenly "shapeshifts" into a big pink blob for a second or 2.

These are merely artifacts of the compression. For something as small as an eye, by the time the footage has been compressed and converted and put onto you tube, you don't have a photo of an eye, you have in some cases maybe only a few coloured dots representing an eye. With something that small, errors and oddities are commonplace.

I generally watch the Queen's speech with my parents on Christmas Day. On the proper resolution tv picture, there were no such artifacts, no lizard eyes, nothing untoward whatsoever.

[edit on 8-4-2010 by TheIrvy]




top topics



 
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join