geological question..., page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 1-1-2008 @ 05:43 PM by St Udio
reply to post by last time here





if one is burried recently, their remains are interred the necessary '6 foot under'....will future excavations of a grave site determine that the 'strata' the bones were discovered in were several hundred years earlier than the day they were ritually buried?


some of those bones, fossils, artifacts, we find or excavate may not have just dropped on the surface of the land, they may have fallen into a hole or a ditch which caved in or got avalanched.



that cosmic debris thought is real , but i wouldn't figure that it would count much, maybe 1 mm in a decade & mostly accumulated on the sea floor...

but what might make a geologic difference is an impact by a meteorite/comet which might bury an existing landcape or topography by as much as several feet of material thrown up by the impact.



all in all, a thought provoking question, not easily or conviently explained


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 12:11 PM by xianh
Originally posted by St Udio
reply to
post by last time here



if one is burried recently, their remains are interred the necessary '6 foot under'....will future excavations of a grave site determine that the 'strata' the bones were discovered in were several hundred years earlier than the day they were ritually buried?


some of those bones, fossils, artifacts, we find or excavate may not have just dropped on the surface of the land, they may have fallen into a hole or a ditch which caved in or got avalanched.




this is a very good question, I am an archaeologist and I will explain this. In general, there is the "the law of superposition" in archaeology/geology, where by layers of rock/dirt that are above other layers are younger than than the layers below. This is typically, how artifacts are relatively dated to eachother (i.e. older or younger).

However, when you find pits, e.g. burials, storage pits, etc that are dug into the ground, obviously the surrounding layers of dirt are older than the contents of the dirt within the pit.

But, one can make the distinction between the two by serval ways.
1) the pit will appear as a disturbed area within the soil profile indicating that it isnt of the same age as the surrounding dirt.

2) artifacts contained within the burial/feature will be of a different age than those of the surrounding layers, based upon already know ages of artifacts types.

3) the very fact that it is a burial down into lower layers, indicates that it was dug AFTER the soil layers were layed down. relying upon the above mentioned law of superposition, since the burial couldnt have been dug unless the dirt was already there.

these arent always hard and true facts though, artifacts can move through the soil column dependent upon the type of soil or even animal digging through the soil profile (bioterbation).

Quite often you find artifacts of varying ages mixed together within a single soil layer and it takes a bit of knowledge of how soils work to figure out what goes where.
---------

as far as cataclysmic events they are also move obvious in the record than you might think.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Ancient Aliens & The Riddle of the Missouri Mystery Mound
  Posted 18 days ago with 75 member flags
Amazing, X-Ray probe of Antikythera Mechanism (Video)
  Posted 16 days ago with 58 member flags
Eye of Horus is actually an early math system?
  Posted 13 days ago with 45 member flags
Pi, Golden Ratio and Speed of Light encoded into Great Pyramid
  Posted 7 days ago with 33 member flags
A Tribute to Native Americans
  Posted 19 days ago with 30 member flags
Why is the Ancient Alien Theory difficult to accept?
  Posted 11 days ago with 26 member flags
Unknown ancient language found on unearthed Assyrian tablets
  Posted 15 days ago with 21 member flags
"The Venus Blueprint"
  Posted 10 days ago with 14 member flags