Yes, it was in Fort Wayne, In. They are rare here.
And awesome to see all the first hand reports here
It is, of course, the small red one... 
I test deleted one for like a day from photobucket and it 'held' on my ATS post, so I dumped the rest. Now I know
Mad at my own dumb self (it was some good work).
Originally posted by RabbitChaser
Technically it's another one in the U.S.It is, of course, the small red one...


I missed these two larger ones earlier. It's weird... after the rash of small ones off Oregon, Cali and in
Alaska... now there is this outbreak of ones ranging from 4.6-6.4 now


Hey, what happened to my thread, it never used to be like this, this is the first chance I've had to get one in in a week.

I never keep busy all night at work, apex... I need to do something to stay awake!!
And then it seems I spend my time here thru
the day and at least keep checking in.
Scientists say they know far too little about Midwestern seismic zones like the one that rumbled to life under southern Illinois Friday morning, but some of what they do know is unnerving.
The fault zones beneath the Mississippi River Valley have produced some of the largest modern U.S. quakes east of the Rockies, a region covered with old buildings not built to withstand seismic activity.
"We cannot even borrow on the knowledge they learn on the West Coast" because quakes that happen in California - where tectonic plates beneath the Earth's surface collide - are so different from Midwestern quakes that happen far away from the edges of the nearest plates.
It isn't entirely clear, for instance, whether the Wabash faults are related to the New Madrid faults or not.
