posted on Jan, 17 2008 @ 03:33 PM
well. it looks to me like an attempt to 'debunk' any conspiracy theory about 911.
your list of 'debunked' stuff:
hijackers still alive: not debunked.
no planes: not debunked.
firemen in on it: not debunked.
a much better approach is to focus on what is VERIFIABLE, ADMITTED IN WRITING, VIDEOTAPED, MEASURED WITH SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, ETC.
focus not on what wasn't, but on what was. speculation on the meaning of evidence is a high art. not a science.
and, of course, shanksville and WTC7 are great starters, because they are the most anomalous by FAR.
something else useful would be teaching people to weigh the evidence IN TOTO, and not piecemeal. also, the word "proof" and the words "thoroughly
debunked" have no real meaning, anymore. they are bandied about like "racecar driver"'s and "movie producer"'s titles are in a pickup bar.
i say lose the bandwagon, and everybody get a chopper, instead.