It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Footage of Bhutto's death

page: 1
17
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:


posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 04:44 PM
link   
Click watch this report.


You can can see the bullets move her scarf as it lodges into her neck/back then she goes down

www.channel4.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 05:02 PM
link   
Great find. She was definitely shot. It was possible that a head strike on the steel handle could have caused damage, but wow...it looks like 2 shots hit her. I do find it interesting though that the shooter was not the suicide bomber. Was that the insurance policy if the guy backed out or if they were afraid he would talk if arrested? I wonder if the shooter knew the bomber was even there?



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 05:03 PM
link   
With so many people trying to tow the official "she banged her head" jargon must really look stupid now.



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 05:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by harddrive21
Great find. She was definitely shot. I wonder if the shooter knew the bomber was even there?

What if he dropped a detonation pack across the steet and as soon as the shooting was complete he pulled a Hudini by remote detonating the pack?

[edit on 30-12-2007 by IvanZana]



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 05:06 PM
link   
Yeah - the current administration looks stupid now. This is the equivalent of the Zapruder film. Do you think the shooter knew the bomber was behind him? It would have been easier to give him a gun and explosives.



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 05:07 PM
link   
I love how the media is portraying that she hit her head on the sunroof. EVEN if she did hit her head on the sunroof SHE WAS STILL ASSASSINATED BECAUSE SHE WAS TRYING TO DUCK FROM THE PERSON SHOOTING AT HER!!!!!!! How stupid do they think we are!!!!



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 05:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by harddrive21
I wonder if the shooter knew the bomber was even there?


Perhaps not. These guys are compartmentalized to a tee and one hand may have no idea what the other is doing for security.

The bomb may have also been intended as a decoy and the shooter either had a lear shot and went for it, or jumped a gun a bit so to speak.



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 05:08 PM
link   
Again Wow. That makes you think if the explosives were a diversion or if it went off early. Al-Qaeda has a history of placing secondary explosives to take out emergency response workers to delay the help getting to the primary target.



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 05:10 PM
link   
Even though they are compartmentalized, to have them within feet of each other would be highly unlikely unless the bomber had a picture of the shooter and his mission was to take him out after the shooting. With so many people at the rally I just have to believe that the bomber was targeting the shooter.



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 05:18 PM
link   
I would venture to guess the bomber was sent to take out the shooter.

No shooter, no link back to the government.

Maybe this was a hit by the government in conjunction with Al CIAda?

Wouldn't be the only regime using AQ as a scapegoat...

This whole situation stinks like maybe Musharraf is behind the assassination.



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 05:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by goosdawg
This whole situation stinks like maybe Musharraf is behind the assassination.


Or a false flag to make it look that way. Musharraf has alot to lose in this, moreso than he would have gained IMHO. Bhutto was no angel mind you and her trail of corruption was pretty long.

I have and still lean towards the Pakistani Secret Service. That have CLOSE ties to insurgents (goes back to the Soviet invasion of Afganistan)



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 05:24 PM
link   
Fred T and others : Would you consider that maybe it was someone or a group from Iran? It would be a great false flag. Cheney would finally get his war. They have alot to gain with it by keeping Pakistan a Militant Islamic state - and maybe access to a few nukes.



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 05:37 PM
link   
reply to post by FredT
 


Then why the rush to hose down the site?

The conflicting reports of how she actually died?

First it was "she was shot."

Then the "official" government position that she "bumped her head?"

Now we can see that she was indeed shot, hit at least two times.

Yet in the other video we can hear at least five shots?

And now the government is offering to exhume the body if the family requests it to be done weighed against the husband's initial request that no autopsy be performed?



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 05:45 PM
link   
Little bit out there but what if it was two separate attempts? One sent a bomber, the other sent a gunman....



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 05:55 PM
link   
Maybe Asif Ali Zardari, Benazir's widower is behind it...or the son, he looks like a crafty little so and so....BBCNews | Bhutto's son named as successor

I don't know, just throwing stuff out there.

It's not like Asif Ali Zardari is an angel, either.



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 06:00 PM
link   
I would guess against the son since he is staying in school for now. Her husband is taking control of the party. He has a pretty long laundry list of accusations against him.



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 06:19 PM
link   
Great find...thanks IvanZana


And yeah hikix they must think we are really stupid to believe that she died only from head injuries.

Bhutto was marked for wastage years ago. Her returning to her homeland Pakistan make it all the more convenient.

As for the earlier claim of responsiblility by Al Quaeda...I do not buy it.

Methinks she knew too much about something
that implicated



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 06:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by harddrive21
Fred T and others : Would you consider that maybe it was someone or a group from Iran? It would be a great false flag.


Perhaps, but I doubt it. Even if the extremist get control of Pakistan, The Iranians are unlikely to get a warm reception from them. its that old Sunni versus Shiite issue and while they may have the same overall goal that would prevent any real cooperation. They would be replacing a iffy US ally with a Islamic government but of a different sec. I know the differences may seem trical to us, but for sume they have been the subject of wars for ages.



posted on Dec, 30 2007 @ 06:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by goosdawg
Then why the rush to hose down the site?

The conflicting reports of how she actually died?

First it was "she was shot."


I agree the PR and spin on this from Musharrif have been abysmal. But he is used to doing and getting whatever he wants in his country so its not that surprising. Its that old rush to justice by his people that is casting that light.

I do not buy the official explanation either, but it it is so bogus, so inept, so ham handed that they would have to be utterly stupid to think anybody is buying it. Perhaps this was intended all along, knowing they would react int his fashion and look even more culpable.

I think they need to exhume her body and get the offical autopsy account done by say the UN. It is suspicious that the husband wanted no autopsy



new topics

top topics



 
17
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join