Believe It Or Not! Analogous Structure On The Moon And Mars!!, page 1

privacy

Pages: << 1 2 3 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 18 times

Topic started on 28-12-2007 @ 11:04 AM by mikesingh

At first I couldn’t believe it myself, but after my previous thread, Weird Moon Anomaly! A Big UFO Or Artificial Structure? I couldn’t help but notice the similarity of this object with a triangular shaped structure on Mars. Two structures of the same kind in two different locations in the Solar System?

The one on the Moon was discussed in fair detail and the general consensus was that it’s either pixilation or some kind of a sticking tape that had left a mark on the raw image, if not an artificial construct! In the later version of the Clementine browser, the object seems to have vanished! It was either due to NASA tampering the image or the previous version of the browser was responsible for the artifact.

Be that as it may, here’s an image of another similar triangular shaped object, but this time on Mars!! Check out the shape and the protrusions along the longer edge. I have no idea what the heck this all means, but the odds of an identical image anomaly on two different space bodies millions of miles away, taken at very different times and equipment are astronomical - unless they are similar artificial objects in operation on the Moon as well as Mars?

This is the object on the Moon, seemingly smudged out partially by NASA…

Latitude = -35 (not 35)
Longitude = 208
This is the original image taken from the Clementine image browser
www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...

And this one is on Mars which is three miles wide at its widest section, the left vertical edge!

Viking.
Latitude 22.5 degrees, longitude 203 degrees
Enlarged 400%
Courtesy: NASA and Mark Commerford

Why have the links to this mars image been yanked off the net? Smells of a conspiracy, what?

Cheers!

Thanks to internos for the assistance provided!

Ref:
hometown.aol.com...

www-pdsimage.wr.usgs.gov...
www-pdsimage.wr.usgs.gov...
www-pdsimage.wr.usgs.gov...

[edit on 28-12-2007 by mikesingh]

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 11:14 AM by Fraank Fontaine

Looks like a big fuzzy blob, on a fuzzy landscape, on a low definition picture to me.

Don't want to be confrontational, but I see no evidence at all for an artificial structure there.

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 11:17 AM by tep200377

I'm pretty sure it is this ACE Hair comb that the spaceballs team forgot when they searched the desert..

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 11:18 AM by dylant93

the first pic seems a little suspicious but i could be natural...the second one just looks like a crater

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 12:40 PM by Lunica

I think its interesting Mike!

To bad I couldn't find a MOC image to compare with

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 12:43 PM by Jeff Riff

Wow that is pretty interesting. Wonder if Mr Lear has anything to say about that specirfic structure.

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 01:09 PM by abovetech

Nasa always brushes out structures and ufos before they sell them to the public.
It's policy. Confirmed by several employees.
NASA is under NSA control. Always has been.
NASA is a joke and the movie to distract from the real space program.
Check out these radio interviews and check out the book Dark mission.
The other parts are on youtube too.

Dark Mission: Hoagland Pt.1
www.youtube.com...

Tower Ruins on the Moon Pt.1
www.youtube.com...

Fixing NASA Pt.1
www.youtube.com...

NASA Deceptions pt.1
www.youtube.com...

And some disclosure project 2001 witnesses about NASA:
youtube.com...
youtube.com...
youtube.com...
youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...

Still haven't got enough?

youtube.com...

[edit on 28-12-2007 by abovetech]

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 01:27 PM by lunarSightings

It's hard to believe that the Navy spent all that money to take digital photos resulting in less quality than off-the-shelf digital imaging chips readily available in the 90's...

"On January 25, 1994, the Deep Space Program Science Experiment (DSPSE) (better known as Clementine) was launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, on a mission designed to test lightweight miniature sensors and advanced spacecraft components by exposing them, over a long period of time, to the difficult environment of outer space. In addition to testing the various sensors, Clementine was given the complex task of mapping the moon. The mission results were spectacular."
Source: www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...

Have a look at this example of simulated loss of detail:

Lunar Sightings Research Images (ATS, pg. 3)

This might help some viewers understand how a square blob can be terrain or structure - or just a digital artifact.

[edit on 28-12-2007 by lunarSightings]

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 05:16 PM by Frontkjemper

tep200377, gave you a star because you´ve seen spaceballs.

Singh, you have an incredible talent to find a lot of strange and interesting pictures about space and lunar bodies. I always enjoy your posts.

The first pic does look fascinating, the second one while sharing similarities is rather discearning. If I hadn´t have seen the first pic, I would have thought the second to be a crater.

But since I DO see the similarities, and since our friends at NASA were kind enough to show us through air-brushing that something IS infact there, I find it quite interesting and damning.

I wish we could get a civilian sattelite up there, and take high res photos. Man, that´d be a dream come true.

Peace,
FK

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 06:19 PM by Palasheea

And yet another one?? wow!
Intriguing find Mike!
Interesting how they are similar in shape including those forks on the left straight edge of each 'triangle'.
Sure, when you expand each photo, the one on the Moon also has those fine comb-like forks where the one on Mars does not have that, but I still understand why you posted these images for us to compare.

My question is, why is the Mars image white like that? The Moon image definitely looks like it's been blurred out though. So my next question is, if NASA goes through the trouble of blurring out 'things' like this -- which of course they do -- grrrrr, why didn't they just blur out the whole image/structure/triangle instead of just part of it? Is is because if the whole structure was blurred out it would be too noticeable? My guess is that's probably why. But the Moon photo is fascinating. I wonder what it could be?

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 06:46 PM by Jeff Riff

the only weird thing about the moon structure is that part of it is hanging over a crater. Maybe they were going for the breathtaking drop off view on that end of the building....who knows.

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 06:56 PM by Lecter

The second image looks like is made up of two different photographs. Look below the crater and you can see the vertical line where the images were stitched together.

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 07:08 PM by Nohup

Ah, another crappy image thread. Congratulations, once again you've found some bad images and blown them up to cataract resolution.

I was going to... eh, to hell with it.

Imagine me with a parachute, running toward the open door of this thread. And here I go...

Geronimoo-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o!!

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 07:09 PM by NGC2736

reply to post by Jeff Riff

And hanging a structure over a canyon is weird how?

www.gizmag.com...

Like we would be crazy enough to do such a thing.

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 07:13 PM by NGC2736

reply to post by Nohup

Personally, considering the state of America, I have a suggestion. Instead of using an Indian name, first completely remove the chute and your clothes, throw your wallet out the door, and then run for the exit screaming "Jeffeeersoooon!"

I do like that image better.

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 07:25 PM by Nohup

Originally posted by NGC2736
Personally, considering the state of America, I have a suggestion. Instead of using an Indian name, first completely remove the chute and your clothes, throw your wallet out the door, and then run for the exit screaming "Jeffeeersoooon!"

I do like that image better.

From what I understand, the "Geronimo" cry is a call to emulate the courage and fortitude of a great American Indian warrior. But if you want to take that away, I guess it would just be one more thing that's been ripped off from the proud and noble people blah blah blah yabba dabba doo...

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 07:34 PM by neuralfraud

It's the tape used to hold together the hundreds of smaller photos that make up the whole panorama. On occasion we catch a glimpse of scotch tape peeking out.

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 07:55 PM by NGC2736

reply to post by Nohup

I guess humor is dead on the internet. That was a comment on the state of the economy (the wallet) and on freedom (Jefferson). Nothing to do with any proud and noble anything. Or with the taking away of any image of courage. (Besides, jumping out of a perfectly good airplane is not an act of courage, but rather one of dementia, IMO. And yes, I have. I was once crazy, but I'm all better now.

)

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 08:15 PM by angelc01

reply to post by mikesingh

Your on the ball as usual Mike

The comparison on these two photos show that they are similar in many aspects it's really a shame that we can't have a clear crisp picture to really get the nitty gritty.
A member mentiond about the crater, if it is a crater, it would help if someone wuold trace the geometry, becuase it does not compare to a crater in it's form according to the picture.

reply posted on 28-12-2007 @ 09:36 PM by Hal9000

You youngsters have so much to learn.

Haven't you ever heard of a Space Invader?

They are everywhere!!!!

Kudos Mike.

Pages: << 1 2 3 >> ^^TOP^^