It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Telos
Don't you think countries who decide to install a defense shield have the right to do so without asking permission from 'Mother' Russia?
Originally posted by Telos
What makes you think that other countries are babies in dippers who don't know nothing about how to run a country and need USA or Russia do dictate them what to do?
Originally posted by Telos
If a country decides to install a shield for one reason or another and they ask USA for help, that's their decision.
Originally posted by Telos
If Russia is becoming (actually never changed) so paranoid then I guess is about time for them to learn that they're not the police force in Europe and can't tell to European Countries what and when to do.
Originally posted by Telos
And what economic measures is Russia intending to take against this countries?
Originally posted by Telos
Btw did they pass the starvation period
Originally posted by Telos
or still dealing with the lefts over from from all those billions gotten from USA and World Bank?
Originally posted by maloy
No they are still in hybernation mode with their dancing bears, vodka, and balalaikas - As far as most Americans and Westerners are concerned anyway...
The Stanley R. Mickelsen Safeguard Complex was the United States' first operational ABM (anti-ballistic missile) defense system. The primary goals of this web site are to (1) provide an operational overview of the Safeguard ABM system and (2) document its single tactical deployment at the Mickelsen complex in North Dakota
Spartan was the long range missile used for area defense. It was designed to destroy incoming targets before they re-entered the atmosphere. Because the interception occured much earlier in the trajectory of the target re-entry vehicle, protection could be provided for a large geographical area, thus the term "area defense".
Sprint was the ultra high acceleration missile used for terminal defense. This was a "last ditch" effort to destroy incoming re-entry vehicles that had survived the area defense provided by Spartan. Terminal defense occurred within the atmosphere only a short time before the RV's reached their targets, necessitating Sprint's ultra high acceleration
Originally posted by 4thDoctorWhoFan
Originally posted by intrepid
Hmm, ever hear of the Cuban Missile Crisis? Seems like the US didn't take to kindly to aggressive actions being taken in their back yard. How is this any different?
No, never heard of it.....kidding.
That is not a good analogy for a number of reasons. The most glaring reason being that the missles being deployed in Cuba were actually missles, an offensive weapon, which could carry a nuke warhead. On the other hand, the missle shield is a defensive weapon. BIG difference.
So as long as its the kind of missle the US agrees with its cool? Yea that makes alot of sense. Would we just stand by and be happy if russia were to put missle shields in Canada, Mexico and Cuba? SURE WE WOULD. Good lord.
Originally posted by 4thDoctorWhoFan
Originally posted by intrepid
Hmm, ever hear of the Cuban Missile Crisis? Seems like the US didn't take to kindly to aggressive actions being taken in their back yard. How is this any different?
No, never heard of it.....kidding.
That is not a good analogy for a number of reasons. The most glaring reason being that the missles being deployed in Cuba were actually missles, an offensive weapon, which could carry a nuke warhead. On the other hand, the missle shield is a defensive weapon. BIG difference.
Originally posted by HarlequinIt must make you wonder - since the russian system protects people - the US system protects missiles....
Originally posted by 4thDoctorWhoFan
On the other hand, the missle shield is a defensive weapon. BIG difference.
Originally posted by 4thDoctorWhoFan
Do you think that perhaps these countries might want the shield and think its a good idea?
Originally posted by skibtz
Originally posted by 4thDoctorWhoFan
Do you think that perhaps these countries might want the shield and think its a good idea?
I recall reading somewhere that the shield would be about as useful as a paper bucket to the hosting countries!
I will try and find the source
Originally posted by SimonSays
A missile is a missile, a gun is a gun whether it is used in self defense
or to shoot and kill an intruder is irrelevant.
Originally posted by shug7272
Yea, these countries can really say "no" to the US. I mean look at all the good things we have done to the countries that said no to us in the past. Good lord.
Originally posted by malcr
whew, which christmas cracker did that joke come from.
Anyone who believes the "its not offensive but defensive" line is tru;ly naive. Its a missile system for gods sake!!!! with targetting for god's sake!!!! It takes seconds, literally, to re-target and deploy!!!!
Originally posted by maloy
Don't give a hoot about Russia
Don't expect the others to give a hoot when the next 9-11 occurs
or when Iran and Syria obtain nuclear missiles and the newest air defence technologies
**** happens when your foreign policy's arrogance creates a world momentum that cannot be said to be in your favor.
What you call arrogance, I call confindence. Stop mixing up the two.