No real energy solutions, ever., page

reply to post by jpm1602

---

Well that's part of the problem - that of free energy. Most people understand the economics behind not allowing free energy devices, simply because it takes away the control of making a profit of energy. For those who don't understand it probably own eighteen remote controls and don't feel bad about buying AA batteries all the time (that is another conspiracy though).

Since it would not be feasible for an energy company or consortium to allow free energy or even an energy source that undercuts whatever it is they are already doing, they will never allow a device that actually costs less to manufacture than it would put out in equal value in power. If it did, they would just be losing money directly or indirectly depending on their relationship to the manufacturer.

In other words, if it costs $100,000 to produce a wind turbine, you can be assured that it is designed to not produce $100,000 worth of electrical power - ever. If it actually made money out of thin air indefinitely, then it would be a free energy device and building enough of them could in theory put power companies out of business. Instead, the business model would follow that the service life of the turbine will be short enough that the cost to produce it will be more than what you would normally get out of it.

Wall Street has gamed the system to keep oil prices high despite increased domestic production.
  Posted 12 days ago with 8 member flags

Enough World Oil Reserves for the Next Million Years?
  Posted 4 days ago with 5 member flags

Just HOW much does it cost to produce a litre/gallon of petrol/gasoline ?
  Posted 4 days ago with 4 member flags

who needs oil, We need Weapons Grade Hydride
  Posted 8 days ago with 1 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: