It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I see no harm in wild speculation about what's in the images from the two landing sites. We put them out there in raw form pretty much as soon as we get them precisely so that the public can participate in the discovery process with us. I'm happy to see such a great interest in the images, and who knows, maybe someone out there will notice something that we haven't.
I meant that the life itself, whether small, like bacteria, or larger, like small animals.
Originally posted by Kano
What sort of danger do you mean IMMORTAL? As in the life itself might be dangerous, or the knowledge?
Thank God, it's good to hear that. Who know what those samples could contain if they ever brought them to Earth.
Originally posted by Kano
Ah I see, true. But all the missions at the moment are one-way missions.
Originally posted by heelstone
Well, IMO, they are very reluctant to release any information about possible life on Mars due to the very speculation on cover up that you mention, Kano. Any talk about extraterrestrial life, no matter how unintelligent, could potentially bring questions that NASA or other parts of our government do not want discussed by the media. The mere public discovery of life could give groups already lobbying Congress for UFO information (like CAUS and The Disclosure Project) more leverage to get such information out, and they don't want that at all I'm sure.
Originally posted by heelstone
Kano, you are wondering about why NASA does what it does when its a government agency. Its website is www.nasa.gov... after all. If the government does not want to make its public space program branch bigger with any discovery of life, they won't. I mean, why spend money on the public program that is designed to go nowhere and keep the public uninformed when other stuff is more than likely being used in secret?
Any civilian funded front for space exploration is going to have to look like its doing something at some point. Mars for a long time now has been a public subject of curiosity, so sending little bitty robots over to slightly examine its surface is done as an attempt to sate interest.
Originally posted by Kano
Then why go to the trouble of the MER missions at all? Why bother releasing the Raw data at all?
I couldn't have said it any better myself. Kano, the other thing that's always bugged me is here we are putting millions of dollars into a rover on Mars that doesn't work half the time. Why?
Did you know that most Space Shuttle flights into space now are military in nature.
Originally posted by Kano
I'd be interested to see statistics on this, I thought most military satellites could be orbited without needing the shuttle.
Even still, the discovery of life on Mars could really give the entire space industry a kick in the behind. More funding for more advanced shuttles. Everybody gains, even the military would have a more advanced vehicles to orbit their own equipment.