posted on Dec, 25 2007 @ 08:08 PM
OK, I'm new here, but i've been reading ATS for years. There are just a few things that are troublesome about this thread. Forgive me if some of
these concerns have already been addressed.
First of all, yes, history is written by the victors. However, the event had to take place for the victors to put their spin on it. You found holes in
the "official" story? Well, spotted. All stories have holes. Doesn't make the even as a whole any less true.
You refuse to reveal your source. That's fine. However, history is based off of evidence. This evidence comes in the form of pictures, videos,
documents, personal account. The odds of all of the evidence of the Holocaust being anything than what it is proposed to be is almost astronomical.
There is an absolute wealth of information on the event. Most of this was documented by the Nazis themselves. If we are not to use any of this
evidence, then what are we to use? You've never given a satisfactory answer to this question. Therefore, we are forced to use what is at hand. Was
some of it altered? Maybe. Anything is possible. Did the Allies bomb supply lines? Yes, but why did they exist to begin with? They're the first
things i'd bomb in a war. It only makes sense. Did the Allies know about the camps? More than likely. Did they fund them? Maybe. Maybe not. Hard to
tell. American businessman had dealings with the Nazi party. Most governments have their hands in things the public knows nothing about.
In short, give us evidence to look over. There are always new things to be learned about history. However, without hard evidence, your theories are
just that. Theories. Nothing more.