It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ultra_phoenix
Originally posted by sanctum
If the area is a result of geo' activity, it would one of be 'mother natures' wonders.
A wonder ? I would name it a MIRACLE. Nature & geo activity NEVER did a pyramid.
Do I wrong ?
Originally posted by robertfenix
This photo is a direct overhead shot of the same area as the 3D picture with the pyramid. The pyramid photo is directly from the ESA and I posted the link already.
But after matching the physical features of the large crater on the lower left and the horseshoe crater. Then locating the two fissure marks below the mesa that would be across from the "underground" entrance I find nothing that matches those features on the overhead photo.
So since both of these are from the ESA and are on the Mars Express site. Which one is correct ? or is the ESA covering up photos or purposely reporting (creating) false data of the surface ?