Thank you for sharing this information with us ATS readers. I am sure you are aware that plenty of different Moon surface photos exist on many Internet sites. Although the ones taken by NASA that showed anything of interest have been tampered with, one can still see a few details of what actually is supposed to be beneath all that airbrushing.

Many still look like natural formations, some people just cannot make any sense out of them so their opinion is that there is nothing strange in them unless they have a trained eye to look out for certain features, but a few really seem like structures, buildings, artifacts and so on.

You cannot really blame people for not seeing anything in particular, I for one cannot say that there is positive proof of anything alien in them, but judging by other thousands of ufo, alien photos and video available, thanks to the Internet, credible witnesses accounts, and having seen a couple of unidentifed objects myself at close range I am 100% convinced that we certainly aren't the only ones around and it would be arrogant of me to think otherwise IMHO.

Please keep up the good work and just let anyone believe what they want to believe in . We and millions of others know that we are certainly not alone and nothing is going to change that in the end. I am hoping that true disclosure will happen in my lifetime but that still seems a long way off so far.

Well, it's hard to believe that the Chinese, Russia or the EU would take orders from USA just to protect NASA lies, the global cover up would have to be so large it would be imposssible to maintain. However, any country with their own space program that find anything of value, artifact, information or any other clue that would give them an advantage, would take the opportunity and try to keep it for themselfs no doubt. Anyway the broad public would not know.

Well, good luck with your work, hopefully the chinese space program will not post any image spoilers on the web ruining your book.

So far I see a pile of moon rocks and no evidence of anything out of the ordinary. I guess I'll just keep watching this thread for something interesting.

Here's the deal folks. Seriously.

If you only see a pile of rocks, fine.

But if I told you all that this was a giant spoof - that the images posted above were taken in the early 1900's of an unknown dilapidated structure in a mining town in southern Arizona that suffered an earthquake, you'd probably all take my word for it - curse me for trying to fool everyone - and then tell me to go take a hike (in not so kind words).

BUT IT'S NOT --- it's from a photograph of the Moon that was taken 30+ years ago and has suffered mismanagement and generation loss (to some degree).

The moment I (or anyone else) suggests it's on the Moon and Whoa! Now hold on! You better fly up there and bring back proof. Which leads me to believe that the popularity of this website has attracted misinformation/disinformation, foggers, and distraction specialist who take about 10 seconds before responding that what they are seeing is complete hogwash. Shame on those of you performing that service - get a life.

Try looking at my (and any other image 'proofs' all over this website) with open eyes and stop waiting for a picture of what you think a spaceship or UFO looks like, or what you think a 'structure' (i.e. building) SHOULD look like (on the Moon or Mars).

Form follows function and we barely even made it to the Moon (disregarding other theories)... so none of us can even scratch the surface as to what structure (the form of the function) would end up looking like if we don't have functions on the Moon. NASA is even having a hard time with that right now and they are probably the world's expert on the topic.

If you're having a hard time getting over the fuzzy images, think of it as spy photos from the 60's. People made all kinds of life vs. death decisions using the crappiest of photos back in the cold war. They learned how to recognize what objects were without having to rely on high contrast, atmospherically hazed, perfectly developed photos.

Here are three definitions of structure:

1. The arrangement of and relations between the parts or elements of something complex.
2. A building or other object constructed from several parts.
3. The quality of being organized.

Before some of you smarty pants out there run off and find me photos of Earth things that conform to those three definitions, try instead to one in a photo on the Moon. Once you get used to the geology of the Moon (definitions 1 and 3), then you'll start seeing the objects that don't belong - just like I did. But I'm sure most of you don't have the next 1000+ hours to devote to it like I did.

- Well, that kinda sounded like a rant, but don't take it that way.



P.S. Maybe I should change the book's title to read, "What did you expect? 7-Eleven?

Originally posted by tangent45
Well, good luck with your work, hopefully the chinese space program will not post any image spoilers on the web ruining your book.

The Japanese are busy up there... A friend of mine suggested that the Chinese, should they see something out of the ordinary and realize that we (USA) knew about it, would use it as political leverage.

While I'm at it and nobody is reading these, I'd like to offer a theory that many of you have either heard or considered yourself, that, by the look of these objects (to include other people's research) they sure look busted up and left to rot - as if fading into the background noise of the Magnificent Desolation.

The reigning theory suggests that NASA (et all) printed the photos large scale, had air brush artists 'fog' or camouflage out 'objects', then reshot the photo back onto film - of which that version was handed to the likes of LPI for archiving.

Well... maybe. There are people that say they heard it 1st hand, even claim to have seen the originals, but as far as I know, no air brush artist has come forward (maybe they're all dead?)

I keep leaning towards, at least circa 1970ish, that most of the stuff that I'm finding was abandoned and has suffered many, many years of extreme hot and cold, solar radiation, and meteor bombardment.

Considering all the UFO sightings and people that swear they've been abducted, it's quite possible that there still are operations on the Moon, but on a minimal scale. Maybe there were at one time major operations on the Moon - prior to us having achieved enough technology that we might detect them.

I know - old news for most of you reading this, but I thought I throw it out there again because it sure explains what I'm seeing.

<--- New "Pile of Rocks" avatar.

(sorry, couldn't resist)

Actually, it's also an 'object of interest' I found months back. I have it in stereo, in 3 photos, and from 3 sources. (I think it's three, might be two).

And yes, that's the best one right there. The others are near the edge of the film and suffer from lens distortion. Never the less, one can easily identify it.

Not to be negative, but give me pictures of a whole planet, and I'll 100% show you things that 'look' and appear to be artificial.

Forteans call it 'simulacrum'. The Human eye/mind, likes to make seemingly random things look like things it can relate to to lessen confusion in the conscious mind.

All I saw was blurry pictures with some interesting patterns. Sorry, but from where I am sitting I see nothing that says to me 'OMG! MOON BASE!".

This is not just your pictures, and I am in no way singling you out, it is on *all* pictures I have seen of the Moon and Mars, be they on ATS or from supposed experts such as Hoagland...

Until we see the words 'Hello' spelled out in rocks on the surface of Mars of the Moon, I am afraid that no amount of gazing at pictures, and 'seeing' patterns is going to help.