It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jedimiller
Originally posted by flice
you can ofcourse make Bladerunner look much nicer and more "HD" like.
But I bet if you compare it up close with a movie shot in HD you could still see the difference couldn't you?
Good point. you could try to make blade runner look like HD..and trust me they have..they are selling an HD, blue ray version for 100 each. But of course I know it's not really HD. it's all fake. and a rip off if you ask me. because people are ignorant on the subject.
and you could tell the difference..if blade runner was shot entirely with sony hd cams..you could absolutely without a doubt, know it's HD.
watching a film that was transferred from film, to HD cannot happen. You cannot ever, watch a film that was shot in cellular film..and watch it on HD or Blue Ray. Because they are different technologies. .. transferring film to a computer destroys the original film image.
Originally posted by jedimiller
Well, I don't know too much about how Blue ray works, But I do remember hearing from my teacher that the blue color is the color that makes the movies look sharper
Originally posted by scientist
All that being said, yes HD and Blu-Ray are scams, but so was DVD. The truth is, any type of tangible media that forces you to play it in specific hardware is a scam.
Originally posted by scientist
Hopefully the studios will get smart and start offering HD downloads soon, before they waste billions in legal fees trying to stop the inevitable yet again.
Originally posted by jedimiller
there is no way a movie will ever look good using a microchip memory type device.
Originally posted by Beachcoma
Why the hell not? When it's on tape, it's stored as magnetic 1s and 0s. When it's on optical discs, it's stored as holes and flats representing 1s and 0s. When it's on chip, it's stored as electrical 1s and 0s.
What's the difference? They're all 1s and 0s....
Originally posted by jedimiller
Hi beachcoma,I admit I've never seen a film on a chip. I've seen video clips over my cellphone and they look like crap. I've also seen people watching movies on ipods, so small it's hard to see.
Originally posted by jedimiller
Yes, but DVD was not trying to sell itself as this magical format. The problem I have is in being true to the consumer..telling people out there that movies like bladerunner are in HD when it's not 100% true. I'd rather watch the original version of blade runner on DVD, without the special effects added and all the cleanups. And I saw the final cut at the movies and they changed the entire film, added more blue colors and effects and things...that's wrong from my point of view.
Maybe I should be working in a studio like you to get some sense into those pesky marketers.
Originally posted by jedimiller
Yes, but DVD was not trying to sell itself as this magical format. The problem I have is in being true to the consumer..
telling people out there that movies like bladerunner are in HD when it's not 100% true. I'd rather watch the original version of blade runner on DVD, without the special effects added and all the cleanups.
Originally posted by jedimiller
Originally posted by HighDefinitionFilms
With all due respect to Mr Jedi,
as a filmmaker,
I must say you could not be more mistaken...
So legalizer get's 15 stars for calling me a fool?
And Highdefinition gets another 15 for debating the subject and including nothing but his own beliefs on digital film.
Look, I am all for digital film, but it will never replace real film, never.
but I take Highdefinitionfilms comments are somewhat bias, with a username like that.
You guys make good points, but most of you validity comes from comparing the DVD bits with the TV resolutions..and that has absolutely nothing to do with what i'm talking about. I am talking about selling a product as HD film. lets make things clearer, So, I wont get personally attacked anymore. Having taken 5 film courses, I think gives my points more valid? I think so.
1. lets not label the films as HD films. Lets label then as. "This movie was shot using 35mm film, then it was tranferred into a computer and the grains were filled in with computer pixels". This is not an HD film whatsoever.
2. if the film was shot entirely in HD, like Revenge of the Sith. then we can say. "this film was shot in HD and is meant to be seen in HD"
those should be the rules.
Now think about this, you take a photograph from 1980 on film. you scan it on your computer and show it to your friends. is the photo now a digital photograph? no. that's my point. you cannot make an old photo print new and show it off as digital. that's what's happening with film.
you are fooling the viewer and the consumer.
when you get that 1980 photograph and make it digital and tell people it's an original digital print you are lying to them.
I am a purist.
I am not talking about what HD TV you have and how good it looks. of course it's going to look good, the original film has been violated and transformed into something that's not. so please, let the personal attacks end there.
If George Lucas makes the empire strikes back into an HD film, then those purists better be pissed, because filling in those grains is like painting over the original film and you don't do that to art.
I'm just saving people money here, so they don't have to go out and buy their favorite movies all over again..and in two versions.
I already have the movie "The thing" in 3 versions. VHS, DVD collectors edition, DVD special edition. And now I have to get the HD and Blue ray editions because the studios are pushing for it.
I don't see why people get so irritated with a subject like this.
it's just a film choice and what kind of technology you want to use..I for one prefer film and Tube televisions. Sorry, can't get into all the LCD hype.
I just purchased the depeche mode remastered CD's. lol. they are basically cleaned up and filled in with sound to make them sound better on CD. but of course I know that they never sounded that good to begin with, so it's a fraud. but I got them anyways, because I love depeche mode.
you could try to make blade runner look like HD..and trust me they have..they are selling an HD, blue ray version for 100 each. But of course I know it's not really HD. it's all fake.
and a rip off if you ask me.
because people are ignorant on the subject.
and you could tell the difference..if blade runner was shot entirely with sony hd cams..you could absolutely without a doubt, know it's HD.
Originally posted by jedimiller
Originally posted by scientist
All that being said, yes HD and Blu-Ray are scams, but so was DVD. The truth is, any type of tangible media that forces you to play it in specific hardware is a scam.
Yes, but DVD was not trying to sell itself as this magical format.
The problem I have is in being true to the consumer..telling people out there that movies like bladerunner are in HD when it's not 100% true.
I'd rather watch the original version of blade runner on DVD, without the special effects added and all the cleanups. And I saw the final cut at the movies and they changed the entire film, added more blue colors and effects and things...that's wrong from my point of view.
Maybe I should be working in a studio like you to get some sense into those pesky marketers.
I'd rather watch a beta tape than watch a movie on an Ipod, Mp3 player or on a computer using digital storage. there is no way a movie will ever look good using a microchip memory type device.
Downloading movies on the internet should be illegal and punishable by law.
I've seen video clips over my cellphone and they look like crap.
I think the reason that is, because the digital memory can never hold that organic feel about film.
it can also get lost in all the times and loose relativity and overtime not lasting.
I think you have have about 4GB's and still not fit the entire star wars film in the appropiate size relating to the original. you would have to digitize it down and dumb it down for the player.
Edit; and they tried that in the 70's with atari games..you know when you slided the cartridge in? later you started having the connectors fading and the connections didn't work.
Originally posted by jpm1602
From what I have read/heard 1080progressive scan is superior to 1080interlaced scan. P is faster, high speed action tends to blur on interlaced.