It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Back to the theme
Typhoon has a full gym, a sauna. It’s requirement. Artificial solarium with plants, flowers, vegetables, etc.
It’s not a submarine, it’s a spaceship of death.
Why is the CO2 scrubber sensor linked into the second stage automatic release sequence?
Crew includes doctors, plural. Mandatory/redundant physical/psychological exams, which are confidentially examined by a third party, and entered into the database.
That’s a kind of question that secures a life policy that no money can buy.
I only hope that we’ll have enough time to dismantle our numerous “Dr. Strangelove” scenarios before we build one that lives, in a way that simply no longer includes us.
Originally posted by KINGTIGER10
Look at the SS-18/19/20/24/25 They have bigger payloads yields, and Range that the C-4, Minuteman 2/3, Trident d-5 and most of them have solid propelants
Perhaps YOU should look at them. SS-25 is a 45 tonne missile with a mere 1000kg payload. No solid propellant russian icbms have even close to the payload capacity of U.S. icbms when adjusted for weight.
I think you have already drowned. Forsaking the help of the west at the expense of life
I’m guessing reading comprehension is not your forte.
I’m sorry, did I give you the impression that I actually care?
I believe it is an artificial coral reef.
Those doctors would be more useful on the mainland, don’t you think?
The west offered help for free, there was no money spend.
What are you like 90 now? Hey gramps, I know 8 tracks are all the rage in Russia, but please use contemporary references.
Iskander he has asked you 6 times the same question - will you answer that question and stop ignoring it .
S-19 has a 4950 kg payload 105.6 TONNES
Well it doesn't even matter Russia:
Originally posted by KINGTIGER10
S-19 has a 4950 kg payload 105.6 TONNES
Ss-19 is liquid propellant. Liquid propellant missiles typically have greater throw weight for any given missile weight. A Peacekkeeper, scaled up to 105.6 tons would have a throw weight of ~4750kg just using scaling laws, a bit more when you factor in reduced drag and a better mass fraction of fuel.
Back to the old topic. Throw weights for slbms are based on "The greatest throw-weight demonstrated in flight tests of an ICBM or SLBM of a new type shall be no less than the maximum calculated throw-weight that an ICBM or SLBM of that type could deliver to a distance of 11,000 kilometers for ICBMs, or to a distance of 9500 kilometers for SLBMs." START TREATY
This allows comparison among slbms. The bulava, with a throw weight of 1.15 tonnes , equivalent to the topol-m, but to a shorter maximum range. 11000 km vs 9500km, but is 10 tonnes lighter then topol-m and less aerodynamic.
Compare that 1.15 tonnes to the trident d-5 at 58.5 tonnes and a throw weight of 2800kg. A bulava blown up to 58.5 tonnes would have a throw weight of ~1830kg, slightly more when considering other factors. Russian should stick with the r-29rm slbm and leave the solid propellant business to the experts.
A Peacekkeeper, scaled up to 105.6 tons would have a throw weight of ~4750kg just using scaling laws, a bit more when you factor in reduced drag and a better mass fraction of fuel.
Year Deployed: 1986
Dimensions: 21.6 meters length, 2.34 meters diameter
Weight: 88,450 kilograms
Propulsion: Three stage solid plus liquid PBV, cold launch
Throw-weight: 3,950 kilograms
www.cdi.org...&f/database/usnukes.html#mx
Payload (t)
4.05
4.05
4.05
4.05
www.fas.org...
The sale of SS-19 stages most likely exhausts Ukraine's ability to supply previously non-deployed ICBMs to Russia. Although Ukraine still possesses about 55 disassembled SS-24 ICBMs awaiting disposal, these solid-fueled missiles are unlikely to be of much use to the SRF, as their solid fuel would require complete replacement. In contrast to liquid-fuel missiles, which can be stored in defueled state, there is no way to store solid-fuel missiles in that state, or to arrest the decomposition processes within their fuel elements
cns.miis.edu...
yes, it has a larger stockpile , but the numbre of nukes deployed is lesser than USA
i am not interested in speculation , the MX had a payload of 3950 kg , while soviet SS-24 solid fueled missile had a payload of 4.05 tons .....
Originally posted by Harlequin
you need to remember that whilst US ICBM`s will be armed with nukes - russian ICBM`s can be armed with not only nucleaer , but also biological agents.
And those ICBM`s have TVC engines and anti laser coverings to be imune off the ABL system..
TVC to dodge THAAD. Anti laser layers to defeat ABL.
And to top it off: They have better range.
Originally posted by KINGTIGER10
And wings to fly into the heavens where they will be they will be blessed by God and made immune to all harm.
I ask you to do some research and stop posting this drivel.
Please read my previous posts so you do not look like a fool. Thanks in advance.