posted on Dec, 25 2007 @ 02:22 PM
reply to post by Fritz Lang
In order to be taken seriously - or just researched in a proper fashion - it is absolutely imperative for the author of the website to list the
references to the original
(For example, if I was to examine the alleged 1917 incident, - involving the "Red Baron", no less - I would like to know where I can get the
original, i.e. first, source of this story - and it isn't listed.)
And I, too, am surprised to see that the most compelling alleged sightings - the one in ancient Egypt, the Nurnberg incident etc. - are actually
missing. How come?
Anyway, all of the above is meant to be constructive criticism, not bashing.
[edit on 25-12-2007 by Vanitas]