Another Face On Mars!! Check This Out! , page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 23-12-2007 @ 06:52 AM by Tuning Spork
reply to post by Palasheea



Palasheea,

I presume that Mike added the "copyright" text to the photo only because several of his recent entries have been copied and pasted, uncredited, by other websites.

Mike isn't claiming to have taken the photo. He is merely protecting his original interpretation just in case it gets copy/pasted. You or I would do the same in this circumstance, I'm sure.

Carry on...


reply posted on 23-12-2007 @ 07:35 PM by NGC2736
reply to post by internos



You and Zorgon The Magnificent are not wrong about the one line posts that get stars. Smaller minds cannot discern between agreement and skilled presentation.

In Space Exploration, I send a U2U to posters of one liners when I see them, as a reminder, but after that I give them a points deduction. Sadly, there is no way to handle the stars, except, like now, to publicly point out that it is a sure indication of their status in the gene pool.


reply posted on 25-12-2007 @ 01:45 PM by Alxandro
reply to post by zorgon



Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Alxandro
I saw the same image today when I burned my tortilla, and again later when I looked at the clouds.


Hope you took picture because with a story like that we will require pfoof to back it up



Sorry I did not take a pic because I was too hungry but luckily someone already beat me to it.


Actually I think it looks more like Jesus.
And here is another..


And another:


Come one Zorgon, you have to admit this is a little on the extreme side. I don't know about you but this is what I see:


[edit on 25-12-2007 by Alxandro]


reply posted on 26-12-2007 @ 11:48 AM by blueyedevil666
reply to post by Jimmy910130



how can you copyright an image you didnt take or even own? isnt this photo 'owned' by whatever space agency took it? with their equipment?



reply posted on 26-12-2007 @ 08:45 PM by rhw007
What is MORE interesting than a "new" FACE on Mars is exactly how MANY VERSIONS there are of the current "Ares Face" laying there in Cydonia.

I have put together images from ALL the orbiters to EVER have acquired the famous ( or infamous as one may view it ) orginal "HEAD" image first found by Tobias Owen in 1976.

They all can be found here:

hiddenmessagejournal.com...

I started with the "CATBOX" infamous image because this is the FIRST image that NASA/JPL/MSSS released to the public after publicly announcing it had targeted it and acquired it...so the "MEANSTREAM MEDIA" just pounced on it. With Dan Rather proudly saying..."See it was just a pile of rocks all along...time to move along." that Sunday April night in 1998.

AGAIN...like in 1976 when Gerry Soffen took Owen's HEAD image out to the more than 1,000 news media and stated that "another picture was acquired later showing it was nothing more than a trick of light and sahdow it had dissapeared'...NO ONE asked to see that second image CONFIRMING it was a "trick of light and shadow".

NASA has since admitted that there NEVER WAS a second image confirming that on that day and that Mr. Soffen had LIED. Whether ORDERED to do so, or did it on his own (why would one do that to the media?) we will likely never know.

BUT...even as we are now in the 'modern era' we can see that the "Shennanigans" about the "Ares Face" has not stopped with the vaious images we have of it, the latest attempt being the "Unicorn Horn" put out by ESA/MSSS...also at the above site.

Bob...


reply posted on 27-12-2007 @ 11:13 AM by mikesingh
reply to post by rhw007



Hey Bob! Welcome to ATS!

Thanks for that link which was pretty informative. But what do you say about that 'face' in the opening post?

Cheers!


reply posted on 27-12-2007 @ 11:24 AM by mikesingh
Originally posted by blueyedevil666
reply to
post by Jimmy910130


how can you copyright an image you didnt take or even own? isnt this photo 'owned' by whatever space agency took it? with their equipment?


To lay this copyright issue to rest, here it is in layman's language:

It is TRUE that one cannot record live raw NASA television broadcasts and stamp a copyright upon them. These, as originally broadcast are, and remain, in the public domain.

However…when one isolates selected portions from these raw recordings, and captures specific video clips from these, they become that persons’ WORK. Capturing still frame images, creating animated GIFs from those images, adding comments or markings, adding a voice over to a video clip, zooming, and enhancing also amount to WORK done. It is the work, done by an individual, which can be copyrighted.
Jeff Challender, Project P.R.O.V.E


I hope that's clear then? Now let's move on!

Cheers!


reply posted on 27-12-2007 @ 06:01 PM by chelley
reply to post by mikesingh



Hi Mike,
I think it will later be shown that you have found a face, the odd's of a face like that with purfectly centred eye pupils must be more than a million to one in nature. It does look in fact more Geometric than the Original face on mars. Maybe it has been partially protected due to it being partly burried? I would estimate billions of years rather than thousands or even millions it would almost seem that it had been excavated at some point having been burried.

Chelle
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 19 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags