WTC 1,2 and 7 are in the eye of the beholder, imo. This man being a NYC tourguide 'might' have a certain biases in the case of the NY attacks, and
it's buildings. I know how it feels, I was a bycicle messenger in my teens in Manhatten for 3 years or so, and also worked other jobs out of the
city, visiting the shop in lower Manhatten everyday for almost a decade. I also lived on LI,NY from birth to my mid 20's.
But after haveing a serious injury in September of 2000. Actually happened on the 11th no less, I fell on the Railroad tracks at Jamacia train
station, forcing me to move to Fl, where I was when 9/11 occured.
Perhaps if I had been in Manhatten that day close to the towers, my views may be different. But then again I highly doubt it. There are those who seek
the truth no matter how scary it might be, then there are those who either have vested interests in looking at things a certain way, or they just
believe if they keep thier heads down and don't think about it, it'll all go away. (I'm not placing the maker of this video in any of those
categories,btw). Just a thought.
But again putting all this aside, as I said The NY attacks are debatable; and can be debated well for either side, depending on the persons
knowledge(as well as the moderator who is nearly always on the side of the debunker, oh well). But the debunker always has the trump card of the
"official" reports to fall back on, and the "crazy no-planers" to quote if they get in a tight spot. Or call us conspiracy theorists, like that's
a hurtful thing, heh, I love when they do that one, then the person and the host chuckle as if some points were scored just by using the term.
But...., bring up the Pentagon, or Shanksville, and these guys don't wanna touch it with a 10 foot pole. the inconsistancies of the flight data
recorder, and the official 911 Commission's "alleged flight path to the pentagon. Watch Pandoras Black Box if you haven't had the chance, very
compelling stuff in there, and it coincides perfectly with the groundwork and interviews Mr. Ranke has done, and what pilotsfor911truth.org believe.
I'd like to see someone explain those inconsistancies to me.
So anyway,even with my minimal education..., I can put 2 and 2 together. If the Pentagon was an inside job, and something fishy happened with flight
93 in Shanksville. Then I have to lean toward inside job in NY.
I believe it was CD. Afterviewing dozens and dozens of hours of footage, and knowing those buildings. As well as going on the testimonies of the
surviving Firefighters, and WTC workers, as well as "The last Man out" William Rodriquez, I've concluded there were bombs that went off in those
As far as WTC7 again eye of the Beholder, but weighing all the information I've looked at, I believe it was a textbook CD. I mean the 911 Commission
wouldn't even touch it. I mean just look at the money they gave the men to figure out what happened? I can't pull the figures off the top of my
head, but I know for a fact it was fractions of what was spent on investigating the Clinton/Lewinski scandal, that is just gross, imo.
But anyhow, thanks for posting this SO, although it's tough to watch someone say stuff that you don't agree with, it's always wise to know what
your up against. Know your enemy as they say
Not that I consider this man my enemy, just a saying ya know. For now I can agree to disagree with him.
But I do see the truth movement getting it's act together, dropping all the things we disagree about, and running with stuff we do agree about and
can prove. It will start small. Then it will begin to snowball. I believe there are still good and honest folks in the American government, and they
just need to have the door opened for them. But it has to be done with level heads, and calm clear minds.
I know It's hard to have a level head though when something is so blatantly obvious to you, and your trying to tell someone and they just won't
listen, it's hard to remain calm(hence whats been going on in the 911 forums lately). Then the truther starts shouting, and it "appears" he has
lost the argument (there has to be a term for this in debating I would imagine). I'm sure if this guy out debated Jones, this is how it was done,
with some help of the NYPD.I'm not up on debating, but I would imagine a good debater is probably calm, and good at pressing buttons, and makeing
thier opponents come out of their skin.
But thanks again for bringing this video to light SO, it just reinforces my beliefs about 9/11 even more, and drive to pass information along to