reply to post by lakotawillfail
The fact that your permanent handle is anti-Lakota shows us that you are a troll who created a login for in order to push your single agenda. I hope
you are banned soon. If not, I am certain you wont hang around long.
BTW, as the name of a nation, Lakota gets a big L.
Originally posted by lakotawillfail
for 1 the lakota have no resources on their land that they arent allowed to get. it is all open to them.
No, I am sorry but you are wrong.
Look at the land we held pre-treaty and look at the resources. A monkey could figure it out.
there is no way they are organized and civilized
We don’t want your civilization. Sorry, it aint as cool as you think, it is just all you know.
the government probably dont care about this at all because they know they cant pull it off and be successful.
They wont until one of the alphabet organizations decides to siege a Lakota "compound" for not paying taxes and it is al over the news. Then
everyone will care right up until the government slaughters them after labeling them as secessionists, pointing to one or two of them who use LEGAL
peyote or a few that were ACQUITED for Lakota freedom actions in the 70's as justification.
no one answered my question: How will this help the indians in any way?
A: Nothing could make the situation worse, so what harm could come of it? The afterlife would be preferable to the situation for those on the res.
B: As I stated, freedom for the sake of freedom is worth the price.
another question: What lifestyle do they wanna live that they already cant?
One of freedom.
One of traditional ways.
A lifestyle that is un-American.
they choose to live in houses and not tepees because houses are better.
WRONG. Not to long ago Lakota children were taken away and adopted out because the parents lived in teepees and tents with no running water or
The houses on the res are filled with toxic mold spores and falling apart. A well built teepee and a comfortable fire would be preferable, just not
acceptable to the feds.
Houses keep the alphabet mafias away.
why would u want to preserve ur culture? u would never advance! us whites dont still ride horses or wear suits of armor. we didnt save our
And quite a good thing that you didn’t! By the time you landed in North America your rivers were so polluted in Europe that you had to give your
children alcohol to drink or they would die!
The streets were the place you threw your trash and feces. To this day it is common to urinate openly on the street in many European cities. Hell, I
couldn’t even enjoy Rome because I couldn’t stand the smell of pigeon crap everywhere.
You came here and brought you "advanced" culture to this clean continent, then you raped the land, murdered the people and their culture and your
factories defecated on the land, just like your bodies did to your water supply in Europe.
We don’t want your advancement and we never did.
We don’t want your commercialism, so we have no jobs on our lands. We don’t want your McDonalds culture and your malls and your schools; if we
did, we would all have left the reservations by now.
You think your way is the right way, and I understand how you think that way because I grew up in your culture.
Maybe it is the right way to YOU and your ilk, but not to us.
You people need to learn to mind your own business, both at home and abroad.
Why do you want to stop us from living the life we want on our land?
I lend a little weight to the nature side of the nature vs. nurture argument here, because although I grew up in modern American society, I have a
deep seated desire to return to the old ways.