Lakota Indians Withdraw Treaties Signed With U.S., page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 69 times


reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 06:34 AM by tetsujin420
reply to post by mythatsabigprobe



If the Government does raise taxes for all those still liveing as US citizens in that are, dont you think that it could cause some sort of uprising?



reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 06:38 AM by Extralien
reply to post by tetsujin420



Heck yes... the US citizens in that area, I presume, would more than happily join Lakota and their tax free system rather than continue to pay taxes that are illegal anyway.


reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 06:44 AM by tetsujin420
reply to post by Extralien



Well I know if this all comes to be, I will join the new Lakota nation. Another question, do you guys think that this will cause other tribes, like the Souix to do the same?


reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 07:05 AM by Extralien
reply to post by tetsujin420



I would like to think that the other tribes will follow suit. I really do.

If I had a choice I would be joining them. But being born in another country kind of upsets that idea a little though I would willingly and happily join a free community such as this. I have recently been looking into micronations, particularly one mentioned earlier in another post, the Hutt river principality.

I am so sick and tired of the continual nonsense most of the major countries have got themselves into and have longed for a change.

To quote a line form the song 'Kings of the wild frontier' by Adam and the Ants..

"I feel beneath the white, there is a red skin, suffering from centuries of taming."
www.youtube.com...

The Hutt river Principality had apparently gone to war with the Australian government but the Australian army failed to turn up.
www.principality-hutt-river.com...


reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 07:15 AM by mythatsabigprobe
reply to post by infinite




It's the area I shaded in this map. Some of the most beautiful land in the country and I really think it should be in the hands of it's original owners, since they're less likely to destroy it like the rest of the country.




reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 07:18 AM by tetsujin420
reply to post by Beachcoma



Oil country! Yeah now I do not see this going through. The shaded section is some of hardcore oil land man. Oil will continue to ruin peoples lives....


reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 07:21 AM by Beachcoma
reply to post by tetsujin420



Ha! Now I see the real motivation behind this 'withdrawal'.

Well, good luck to them Indians. The PTB will likely not agree to it.


reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 07:23 AM by blueorder
reply to post by mythatsabigprobe




what are you gonna do, bring the "original owners" (whatever the frig that means!) back to life!




reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 07:29 AM by mythatsabigprobe
reply to post by blueorder



Like it or not, theyare the original owners and they still live there. If your interpretation of ownership ends with the death of the founders, this country died with the Pilgrims.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^