NWO is responsible for concert pitch A-440hz, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 138 times


reply posted on 27-12-2007 @ 02:49 PM by GT100FV
reply to post by Maya432



Oh, well that's different then. I guess you're right about the frequency being set by the NWO to prevent accidental discoveries of Stargates in our basements.


reply posted on 27-12-2007 @ 02:54 PM by Maya432
Originally posted by GT100FV
reply to
post by Maya432



Oh, well that's different then. I guess you're right about the frequency being set by the NWO to prevent accidental discoveries of Stargates in our basements.

i was kidding you know? well to some extent anyway



reply posted on 27-12-2007 @ 02:54 PM by Pilgrum
Originally posted by Maya432
heres one that looks at the theoretical the differences between using a-432 for the base note
and using f-432 as the base note. but still full of discrepensies.
compared to your graph and some others i have looked at

www.earthmatrix.com...

[edit on 27-12-2007 by Maya432]


The scales I presented were calculated by me but I'm not going to claim copyright on it as it's purely common knowledge.

One thing I should say about employing such accuracy is that you do get absolutely perfect tonal relationships when playing chords even when spread across many octaves with sub-harmonics but:
Because it's so clean and clinical guess what it sounds like IE clean, clinical, mechanical and lacking colour and expression. The expression comes from breaking the strict mathematical rules by bending, pulling, sliding etc which creates beat frequencies and adds the character that makes your spine tingle. A particular guitar may have a special character to it that appeals due to minor inaccuracies in the location of the frets (2^1/12 again) or even the height of the frets and the action near the 12th fret and above producing non-exact notes which highlight the music in unexpected ways.

The NWO didn't make my first guitar - I made it myself


reply posted on 27-12-2007 @ 03:10 PM by Maya432
reply to post by Parabol


who said that I fully understand quantum math?......not I.....but i do understand the basics which is what I have said all along.
and universities lie about so much science that its just nuts.



[edit on 27-12-2007 by Maya432]


reply posted on 27-12-2007 @ 03:13 PM by Maya432
Originally posted by Maya432
reply to
post by Parabol


who said that I fully understand quantum math?......not I.....but i do understand the basics which is what I have said all along.
and universities lie about so much science that its just nuts.
mabey that is changing with all the new ideas and sciences lately though.
I hope so



[edit on 27-12-2007 by Maya432]



reply posted on 27-12-2007 @ 03:27 PM by GT100FV
reply to post by Maya432



It will only autotune to within that range. There are technical limitations to be considered as well, as it's a mechanical device with a range of motion.


reply posted on 27-12-2007 @ 03:29 PM by Maya432
Originally posted by Maya432
Interesting fact:
the new Gibson Robot Guitar will only tune from 435hz to 446hz.
or was that 436 to 445 cant quite remember but check it out

www.gibson.com...


hmmmmmmmm notice how you do not have the option 432 or even 447
nwo will get ya everytime..
and oh ya
ask a keyboardist to tune to 432..
he will go into his pitch adjustment only to find that the 432 is not attainable...hm...just part of the conspiracy????
that has happened to me with a roland and korg that I can remember so far. so thats at least 2 of the Major keyboard makers.

if anyone wants to attempt it on their keyboard then please let me know your results.
my line6 gearbox DOES go to 432 ......wow ...lucky find there....my ROLAND tuner will not


reply posted on 27-12-2007 @ 03:31 PM by Maya432
reply to post by YarlanZey



Now your thinking outside the box.
sorry for the oneliner
-Bobby


reply posted on 27-12-2007 @ 03:36 PM by Parabol
Originally posted by Maya432
reply to
post by Parabol



I did not need to prove anything
the phd quantum physicists are the ones that are proving it..

so averyone needs to put this into perspective ..ok?
I am Not The Scientist
just the Messenger


Ahhhh... damn, I just wrong a long post and accidentally clicked away.... a quick recap.

1. No you don't need to prove anything, so you don't need to prove yourself by telling everyone they are wrong because you are, without a doubt, correct.

2. If you are trying to understand it then listen to what people have to say. I went to your myspace page and listened to your songs, our styles are a bit different but I liked what you put together. Being a musician, why are you unwilling to take into account how external variables; guitars wood, string type, age of strings, finger pressure, air humidity, etc. in accordance with this idea and your music?

3. What does the NWO have to gain by not allowing us to use the 432 standard? Do they want the good music for themselves? You said the frequencies worked out to whole integers but others have posted showing that they don't. And even if the frequencies were perfect, the odds of your instrument perfectly recreating it are low, unless you'd prefer a computer to do all of our playing. That kind of music is for drummers man, we can't let the computers take our guitars away from us!


reply posted on 27-12-2007 @ 03:37 PM by Maya432
reply to post by Parabol


I`m sorry dude because you are basically sayin that Plato.Socates and the pythagoras and the quantum scientists of today are all full of crap..
how can you even make that assumption.???



[edit on 27-12-2007 by Maya432]

[edit on 27-12-2007 by Maya432]


reply posted on 27-12-2007 @ 03:46 PM by Parabol
reply to post by Maya432



Explain to me, in very clear terms, how my statements went against everything Plato, Socrates, and other scientists. It would be clearly ignorant, to any of those men, to discount the real world variables of sound that I mentioned. You still have no provided any factual counters to anything I said. You keep repeating how right your understanding of what you've read is. My doubts are centered on your understanding or application of the subject, not the material itself.

Something else I wanted to mention... I'm not saying these frequencies aren't stronger or that they can't be applied to physics in a positive way. I'm not going against what the equations say on paper. My problem is how it is applied to our perception of pleasing tones. It's like selecting various shades of red, blue, and yellow and saying they are the most appealing frequencies of light. To some they might be, but even if they are technically the strongest it doesn't mean they will always be interpreted that way. The beauty of our perception is that we can each see a different image in the same picture.

[edit on 27-12-2007 by Parabol]

[edit on 27-12-2007 by Parabol]


reply posted on 27-12-2007 @ 04:01 PM by Bluess
Marko Rodin and 432...

Very good thread, well done!

I'm kinda into Vortex Mathmatics, and I would like to contribute with a "vortex" look on the harmonics of 432.

When the note "A" in scale is at 432 we get the following pattern in Fibonacci relationships: Source

A = 432
D = 288
F = 172.8
E = 648
C = 259.2
E = 162
C# = 1080
F# = 720
C# =270
D = 1152
F = 691.2

Now according to Vortex Mathmatics, the number 9 is the highest number witch could represent energy, spirit, god, creation etc...

If we take the above sequense and "smack it" with vortex mathmatics we get the following pattern:

A = 432 ( 4+3+2) = 9
D = 288 (2+8+8) = 18 (1+8) = 9
F = 172.8 (1+7+2+8) = 18 (1+8) = 9
E = 648 (6+4+8) = 18 (1+8) = 9
C = 259.2 (2+5+9+2) = 18 (1+8) = 9
E = 162 (1+6+2) = 9
C# = 1080 (1+0+8+0) = 9
F# = 720 (7+2+0) = 9
C# =270 (2+7+0) = 9
D = 1152 (1+1+5+2) = 9
F = 691.2 (6+9+1+2) 18 (1+8) = 9

So we get a perfect harmonic string of 9's .... (golfclaps of self...)

I am convinced that there is something very important locked into theese patterns, and we have only scratched the surface.... One day... hopefully some super intelligent person, can link it all together from creation til end.

I will come back with more vortex mathmatics to this thread, as there are more connections....
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 17 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 13 days ago with 122 member flags
STOP....Take a STEP BACK....and look at the BIG PICTURE!!
  Posted 19 days ago with 115 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 18 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 14 hours ago, 109 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 12 hours ago, 79 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 9 hours ago, 62 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 16 hours ago, 50 replies