reply to post by Maya432
yeah hey man I'm sorry bout that post, I've had alot of crazy # goin on with the family in the last week, left me a bit fried, dunno where my head
was at when I wrote that really but you're right it was an attack & an unjust one too, and if its any consolation, you couldn't have responded to it
any better more noble way, so kudos to you & apologies once again.
Glad to see you're back in the conversation tho
I just bought an audio interface that came with protools LE 8
(industry standard audio production software)
& it came with this fancy pitch shifter for correcting vocals...
but whats really cool is
although it only allows for 2 digit whole number values of 'cents'
it has this 'cents' pitch shift option for every note
so you could in theory tune the individual notes to both 432Hz AND 440Hz
or some other tuning again,
this effectively could help get around this
'devils interval' & 'pythagoras comma' thing
by simply tuning those notes to a different frequency
but the rest to 432hz...?
but thats not the main thing bout it,
it also has formant pitch shift which allows for values like -31.8cents
& all of the pitch shifting options
display your shift with the corresponding frequency.
So basically,
the industry standard algorythms used in this program
recognised that by shifting A(3) by -31.8 OR -31 OR -32
ALL GIVES A RESULT OF 432HZ!!!!
This means I was totally wrong about the difference between -31 & -32 affecting whether it would still =432Hz or not,
but instead that its up to you to experiment
& decide on which 'side' of 432Hz you prefer.....?
432Hz side closest to 431Hz choose -32
432Hz side closest to 433Hz choose -31
432Hz side closest to 432Hz choose -31.8 (-31.766653633429414)
Point is,
whichever you choose,
or ur software is capable of,
you will still be within the 432hz 'notch'
& still achieve harmonics within their own 'notches'.
Also perhaps if your software has a time stretch feature
that uses a percent value
you might be able to get the more accurate shift
using the figure provided earlier (i think) by mastaG.
Also Bobby, you posted a little while back:
~~~
I will map out all the notes in order and present them to you all.
you may be very surprised when you see the interesting progression
that this scale makes as it evolves to higher frequencies..
&
also I have some more very interesting findings that I have come across but still need to verify before I post it.
~~~
how's this coming along? (sorry to be impatient but...)
I look forward to seeing all of this & particularly the mapped out notes as i'm keen to retune the individual notes in the fore mentioned pitch
shifter & save it as a 432Hz setting...
anyway no hard feelings I hope, I considered removing the post in question... but decided to leave it up there & own my mistakes, so to speak....
edit: firstly I suck at grammar when I'm this tired, secondly i just realised i can't delete my posts [duh] and the edit buttons are gone....spewin
too coz i discovered plenty more douche worthy statements in some of my other posts too....someone make me a time machine..
P.L.U.R.I
-B.Morrison
P.S. Hawk, thanks as always for very interesting Gematria however your most recent posts did my head in, I'm gonna have to take some time to figure
out alot of what those words & references mean... but i'm pretty sure i discovered the (yggdrasill) world tree (which is awesome) through one of your
posts...so i know it will be worth it when i do..
[edit on 17/8/09 by B.Morrison]