reply to post by Navieko
Originally posted by Navieko
So are you telling me, Palasheea, that you somehow managed to come to the conclusion that Ron Paul has no integrity, and had no intention of doing the
right thing -- based on the single occasion he didn't reject/refund $500? Are you making the assumption that he didn't do it to prove a much
GREATER point... but rather just because he has no personal integrity? EVEN when his entire 11 year track record in congress says the complete
opposite?
This is where you are wrong. There is no "
much GREATER point" being made by RP. He is setting a bad example for the youth of this country.
They will end up being confused about this apparent double standard being exercised.
Originally posted by Navieko
Don't just hop on the bandwagon and dismiss all the logic that many intelligent members on this board are presenting right infront of you. I really
thought you were smarter than that.
Palasheea, don't fall for that BS. You're actually very intelligent to be able to discern the difference between actions and words in this
instance.
RP is making no point of Constitutionality here. As long as RP does not campaign to eliminate Black's right to vote, then he has done no wrong. But
when he starts to accept money from this tainted source, and trying to couch it in terms of "Everbody's got a right to donate", then he's only
fooling his Kool-Aid drinkers. Why isn't he also saying "...but I also got a right to say no thank you to his 500 bucks".
There's too much RP support on this board for peole to debate this intelligently. People will condone many actions from RP that they would condemn in
other candidates, simply because they wnat him to win in November. To them, he can do no wrong. Their loyalty blinds them to his faults.
