It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Palasheea
Now I'm understanding why so many of you are attracted to this candidate and in my view, at the present time, it's more to do with him resembling Bush in those things I just mentioned than anything this guy is saying.
Originally posted by Palasheea
I find this extremely unsettling.
Originally posted by Palasheea
Wow! Viewed the video. This is the first time I've ever seen Ron Paul talking in a video and,right off the bat, -- his looks, his facial expressions and his manner of speech reminds me of Bush. Mute that video and just watch him and you will see what I'm talking about. I'm also seeing a lot of restraint there on his part so as not to illuminate those similarities he has with Bush. He knows about that.. I'm sure. Yet, on the other hand, there's that subtle 'thing' about his delivery that wants to bring out those similarities... nevertheless, he has not balenced thing out enough to overcome his wooden-ness.... but I'm sure he's working on that...
Now I'm understanding why so many of you are attracted to this candidate and in my view, at the present time, it's more to do with him resembling Bush in those things I just mentioned than anything this guy is saying.
Originally posted by mnmcandiez
99.9 percent of white supremacists are non-violent. Do not talk about situations that you have no idea about.
And where in the world do you get dead babies from?
Originally posted by mybigunit
Ok Im going to spell this out so simple and your going to be like wow mybigunit you are correct in fact we agree totally and you are just to smart
Part I First off this guy is a single citizen not a corporation or special interest group first of all. He has just as many rites as you and me....we
*SNIP*
Originally posted by dirknb
White supremacists are morons, but I'd keep the money too. Ron Paul's response to this issue was right on.
Originally posted by NewWorldOver
The evidence in this thread is actually quite the contrary. Ron Paul supporters are laughing at this petty scandal and we are not at all affected by the mobs of indoctrinated people lapping this media-fed nonsense up.
Originally posted by Palasheea
So Ron Paul's response was "RIGHT ON THE MONEY"? I whole heartedly agree with you. It's all about the money. Clear as day.
Originally posted by Karlhungis
It is funny that the media will give coverage to a 500 dollar donation to Paul. But turn a blind eye to Hillary somehow pulling in 500k in questionable donations from Chinatown.
Originally posted by SButlerv2
Besides this happened a long time ago and I am sure that the money is spent and since I have given Ron Paul's campaign about $500 I would be pissed to know that it may be my money going from Ron Paul to Mr Black
It takes extraordinary integrity to make that decision.
At the meetups the racial makeup of his supporters is extraordinary.
I even have pics.
Bottom Line is that Dr. Paul did no wrong and this is nothing more than a pathetic attempt to smear his name.
P.S It was great to see Mr Cavuto get pounded.
Originally posted by SButlerv2
So you think its ok to take my $500.00 or funds of another supporter and turn it over to a white supremacist ?
Unless you donated I don't see how this could concern you unless you are here to sling dirt and from the look of your comments that is what you are here to do.
Ron Paul is no doubt more respected, loved and than you are and as you come here to attack him let us ask who are you ?
Your ignorance would be comical if it were not so sad.
This is the second of the two photographs that the Justice Department was confiscating after it was learned that Jorge, who had donated $20,000 to the Clintons, was a major coc aine smuggler.
These two photographs appear to be taken on different occasions, suggesting that Jorge may have contributed on more than one occasion.
Here we have a photo taken at an official DNC fundraiser with Bill and Hillary posed with Ng Lap Seng, Macau Crime Lord who controls Prostitution in that region. His Fortuna Hotel is actually a high class bordello where young girls (often underage) are available for a price. Ng, through his American contact Charlie Trie, donated close to a million dollars to the Democrats.
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
Answer me this: How did this story make its way into the news? Who gave it to the media? Who was screening who donated?
If one propses to hold the highest elected office and, thereby, swear to uphold the principles laid down by our founding fathers, then you must understand that there was nothing "wrong" with accepting that donation.
Our 1st ammendment gives freedom of speech to all men. That is to say, that all viewpoints no matter how despicable or morally offensive, are free to be expressed within
Secondary to this, this donor stated why he gave the money which was based on Paul's beliefs.
If you folks find this donor morally repugnant, fine. But do so based on his beliefs, not Dr. Paul's.
Again, if you want to be FAIR, start looking at whose donating to all of the other candidates. I bet you won't find many willing to publically disclose who's donating. And why would that be?
Do you seriously think that funds fom donors you might find morally reprehensible haven't flowed into the coffers of the other candidates. Sure they have, you just don't know it.
Originally posted by Keyhole
You have to remember it is ONLY $500 we are talking about, not tens of thousands or a million!