Britney Spears Sister is Pregnant, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 22-12-2007 @ 07:10 PM by dizziedame
reply to post by Miishgoos



A sixteen year old girl getting pregnant out of wedlock is not news anymore. It is a common occurrence these days.

At sixteen I was no saint but I did have enough sense and respect for my family and myself to not get pregnant. That was 1963.

I graduated high school in 1965 and there was one (1) girl that was pregnant in my graduating class of 300 students.
The only form of birth control we had were condoms.

I imagine we were just as sexually active as the 16 year olds are today.


reply posted on 22-12-2007 @ 07:38 PM by Beachcoma
reply to post by dizziedame



I have a feeling the OP isn't really concerned about the content of the story. The point I get is that the main stream media is showing preferential treatment of how they are covering it. For example, had this been somebody else, they would have been all over the father, who is 19, for committing statutory rape:

Spears Pregnancy May Result in Television Special Rather than Criminal Charges

That's the first point I got -- how it is being presented (in this case, 'sugar-coated')

Point number two that I got is that right now, America has bigger things to worry about. Like Saudi Arabia dumping the Dollar causing the US economy to slide even further. Again, preferential coverage -- stuff that matters doesn't get enough coverage over 'fluff'

Those are the main points, to my understanding. Come on ATS, the headline is not the news, and the title is not the OP!

Now, to answer something trivial the OP brought up:

Originally posted by Ahabstar
Well anyway, hope she doesn't go to her older sister for parenting tips.


She'll probably ask her mom for those:
Spears' mom's parenting book to be released




reply posted on 2-1-2008 @ 03:38 PM by MurderCityDevil
reply to post by Ahabstar



teens having been having sex and getting pregnant forever, its nothing new

its just that her sis is famous which is all the hype

get the ---- over it


reply posted on 2-1-2008 @ 06:28 PM by RuneSpider
reply to post by Agit8dChop


Hey. I like Tasmania.

Thanks for the important news update. I'll definitely apply it to daily life.


reply posted on 23-1-2008 @ 01:49 PM by Ahabstar
Don't often check this forum. Imagine my suprise that this was still on the front page.

To clairify: Yes that fact that this was touted as news by the MSM when far, far more important things were going on at the time. And yet we had this...as...news. Mindboggling. I mean wasn't that the point of the show Entertainment Tonight? To handle this kind of "news" and leave the real news for the grown-up anchors like Brokaw, Jennings and Cronkite. Pipe dream I know...we have Katie Curic, Charles Gibson and Brian Williams now, which I had to look up since I stopped watching television completely after 9/11 other than when it on at someone else's house while visiting. All radio WLW and the net for news now.

As for the commentary of young mothers being nothing new. Well aware of that fact as my own mom was 16 and pregnant with me and gave birth 3 months after turning 17. And yes, mom and dad are still married, 38 years this July. So no, the fact that she was 16 was not my point either. Although I was serious about hoping she didn't ask her sister for parenting tips.

Myself, too much of a loner for marriage and family but my sister married after college and has 3 boys. Things for her and my brother-in-law are well, but naturally busy. But since I live several hours away from everyone her oldest asks his grandma when is Uncle Greg coming when I had to miss out on Chistmas last year.

So while I wish Spears and her baby well, it wasn't really worth the attention the story had when there were things of far greater importance happening. And while my OP was an undiluted rant of what would become a multi-day/weeks long story.

Some of the responses in the thread were interesting. Full of venom, undiplomatic and outspoken. Much like the current administration's responses to negative rhetoric and propoganda. So if you strip the significance to the topic and see it as information that you didn't want to hear about, then the base emotions of the reactions and responses to reactions go far in to explaining how we as nations become involved in unresolved differences that could lead us to wars. In otherwords mistaken conclusions to words, dehumanising, breaking off commuication, and inflamitory responses. Posting with a title of a fluff piece that broke when I posted and the president being briefed on the possibility of an Iranian Nuclear Weapons program garners pretty much the same reaction, the difference being that we only speak for ourselves and the President speaks for the nation. Well that and us going too far is just a big red warn tag...hopefully the president doesn't view it in the same way.

While many will still see this thread as nothing but tripe. I found it quite educational and informative. The media does far more than condition by repeated rhetoric to make the masses grunts "war" in unison. They also do a fine job of making people jaded, unattententive and impulsive thanks to the Education system that rewards based on answering faster than the question is asked by repeative drilling of information until bored.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Have You Seen the Attention-Grabbing New TIME Cover?
  Posted 16 days ago with 31 member flags
That Does Not Compute
  Posted 19 days ago with 14 member flags
"I AM" the documentary in full on Youtube
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags
The one topic even TED won\'t touch: Income Inequality
  Posted 10 days ago with 10 member flags
Denying Ignorance about Copyright
  Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags