It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ripped Off Yet Again!! Now My Thread Is On YouTube!!!

page: 4
10
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 21 2007 @ 06:50 AM
link   
hi to all you guys and mike well you really did me a favour puting my user name in lights on this site ive had 1000+hits in the past 24 hours wow thats amazing maybe i should let mike put more of my vids on this site.id like to make one point i have not made a cent for any of the vids i uploaded to youtube i wonder if mike can say the same ,i did a google search of mike and wow the sites he s into it amazing bet this guy is laughing all the way to the bank.see you on the flipside.




posted on Dec, 21 2007 @ 06:58 AM
link   
reply to post by redphantom34
 


The possibilities that exist for those who do their own research and take the extra effort to put it all together for a website of their own construction really is astounding, isn't it? That he shares it on ATS after gaining permission from admin to link to that website is a bonus for us all.

Major kudos to Mike.




posted on Dec, 21 2007 @ 06:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by redphantom34
hi to all you guys and mike well you really did me a favour puting my user name in lights on this site ive had 1000+hits in the past 24 hours wow thats amazing maybe i should let mike put more of my vids on this site.id like to make one point i have not made a cent for any of the vids i uploaded to youtube i wonder if mike can say the same ,i did a google search of mike and wow the sites he s into it amazing bet this guy is laughing all the way to the bank.see you on the flipside.


Just my opinion, but there you go glorifying yourself again.My god stop.
If Mike frequents other sites, and gets paid for his research and contributions, more power to him.How is that a negative thing?The point is that he DOES do the research.
Geez...



posted on Dec, 21 2007 @ 07:14 AM
link   
reply to post by redphantom34
 


I gave you the benefit of the doubt. I'm taking it back after that post of yours.

Bad phantom! Bad!




posted on Dec, 21 2007 @ 07:19 AM
link   
reply to post by mojo4sale
 


 


Agreed mojo, but what you had brought out in your post was the methodology used. In the thread you had mentioned, instead of the 'External Quotes' I had reproduced Dr Boylan's paragraph in quotes ( " ) at the start and end and needless to say, credited him for it in the end. This was changed by the mods and that paragraph put inside 'external quote' ( [ ex ] ). Rightly, as that was the correct way of doing so. But please do note that the author was mentioned and the link given. Further, as the rules go, not more than 15% of an article can be put in quotes. I had put about 30% of it. So it was put under the 'plagiarism rule' which it actually wasn't. It was concerning the length of the 'quote' and the absence of the 'Ex' tag instead of the quote ( " ) which I had put instead.

So there is a difference in what we're discussing here, and the methodology to be adopted for external quotes. But never was it concerning 'plagiarism' per se!

Cheers!



posted on Dec, 21 2007 @ 07:21 AM
link   
HI IT MAYBE BAD BUT JUST LOOK HOW IVE BEEN TREATED BY YOU GUYS IN THE PAST 24 HOURS EVEN WHEN I DID THE RIGHT THING AND REMOVED THE SED VID AND APOLOGISED IT WAS LIKE BEING BULLIED,



posted on Dec, 21 2007 @ 07:24 AM
link   
reply to post by redphantom34
 


give it a rest, man. all forgiven and forgotten. even more so, once you contribute your own unique research.



posted on Dec, 21 2007 @ 07:32 AM
link   
reply to post by redphantom34
 


The thing is that ATS as a whole takes it's copyright issues seriously. You can look around on this particular forum and see a couple of threads about it. People here don't mind sharing there work, they just ask for proper acknowledgement of it being thier's.

Oh and no need to shout mate, most of us can read quite fine.

[edit on 21-12-2007 by GAOTU789]



posted on Dec, 21 2007 @ 07:34 AM
link   
reply to post by mikesingh
 


Sorry Mike, i wasnt pickin' on you man i was just trying to make a point, albeit not very well.
and then redphantom came out straight after my post trying to give him/her the benefit of the doubt and made me look a dill.

Oh well.
I still believe in giving the benefit of the doubt, if i hadnt been given a second chance many years ago i may have spent a considerable amount of time inside, and i believe i've well and truly paid that debt once i was given a chance at redemption. Thats the point i was trying to get across.

Hugs and kisses.


mojo



posted on Dec, 21 2007 @ 07:52 AM
link   
reply to post by redphantom34
 


I only calls em as I sees em.If you were afraid of hostility towards you're actions, you should not have done it in the first place.Like I pointed out before,you only apologized when you were caught.That is not admirable.It is trying to cover your ass.
Just my 2 cents.
But I will let Mike respond to you.



posted on Dec, 21 2007 @ 10:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by redphantom34
id like to make one point i have not made a cent for any of the vids i uploaded to youtube i wonder if mike can say the same ,i did a google search of mike and wow the sites he s into it amazing bet this guy is laughing all the way to the bank.see you on the flipside.


redphantom, I had initially thought I'd accept your apologies. However I take serious umbrage to the slander you are trying to spread by your very immature posts. This amounts to character assassination which I highly object to.

You’ve done a Google search for mikesingh? Have you done a similar search for your pseudo? There are dozens of pages on your name. So did I say it’s amazing to see you in so many sites (some porn too) and that you are laughing all the way to the bank? I didn’t because I have a sense of decency and decorum and trained to act like a gentleman. You’ve forced my hand now. And are you so naive as to suggest that there is only one 'mikesingh' in the whole world?

And I don’t need to laugh all the way to the bank by posting stolen videos on YouTube and trying to make a few bucks doing so. I have enough to last me a few generations. So I wouldn’t be wasting my time doing that.

I am not going to indulge in useless and time-wasting arguments with people like you who are a manifestation of poor behavioral characteristics as seen in juvenile delinquents.

Period.



[edit on 21-12-2007 by mikesingh]



posted on Dec, 21 2007 @ 10:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by redphantom34
hi to all you guys and mike well you really did me a favour puting my user name in lights on this site ive had 1000+hits in the past 24 hours


Wow, 1000+ hits in the past 24 hours!! AMAZING!! That's so cool! Because YouTube views mean something of importance! You're on your way!


Originally posted by redphantom34
id like to make one point i have not made a cent for any of the vids


And that makes plagiarism right? You may not have made a cent, but you gained some self importance ego points for yourself with all of those compliments you received for ripping someone else's work and passing it off as your own.


Originally posted by redphantom34
bet this guy is laughing all the way to the bank


No because I don't know anyone who laughs all the way to the bank. If I did know someone like that, I'd cease to be their friend or admit I know them.

So I'd appreciate it if you didn't use that stupid saying again.

Thanks......

....see you on the flip side.

[edit on 12/21/07 by NovusOrdoMundi]



posted on Dec, 21 2007 @ 10:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by mikesingh
There are dozens of pages on your name. So did I say it’s amazing to see you in so many sites (some porn too)....


I had to compose myself after falling out of my chair!!!


That was the body shot of all body shots! Dude's gonna be spitting up blood for weeks.

Peace



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join