It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Russia threatens to target US missile shield with nukes

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 19 2007 @ 05:00 AM
link   
According to the telegraph:


Russia has threatened to target two proposed American bases in Europe with its nuclear missiles if the Pentagon pressed ahead with its plans for a missile defence shield.
In an escalation of the Cold War-style threats favoured by President Vladimir Putin, the general in charge of Russia's ballistic arsenal said that he could target the bases in Poland and the Czech Republic that will host the missile-interceptor shield if America insists on building them.


www.telegraph.co.uk.../news/2007/12/18/wrussia118.xml


The escalation in tensions over the "missile shield" continues.
Thanks to this policy,the Russians now want to target European cities with nuclear missiles.
Is this now truly the new "cold war?"




posted on Dec, 21 2007 @ 02:42 AM
link   
This honestly doesn't surprise me overly much. To tell the truth, I would probably be far more surprised if the Russians didn't target American ABM sites, especially ones so close to their borders. Anti-ballistic missiles, should they be made to work, would be the first line of defence against nuclear-tipped reentry vehicles. Aside from a first strike designed to take out the enemy's nuclear capability - which is, apparently, a nightmare to even plan, let alone carry out - such systems are really the only way to stop an inbound ballistic threat. Certainly, something like the Airborne Laser, or some "Son of Star Wars" satellite system could do the trick, but it doesn't look like either of those will be ready for deployment any time soon. In the meantime, ABM would be the only thing that could even provide a chance of shooting down inbound warheads.

With that in mind, targeting the ABM launch sites only makes sense. In the event of a multilateral nuclear exchange - otherwise known as the End of the Bloody World - a system that could, conceivably shield the enemy from your attacks would have to be on anyone's list of priority targets. Having a couple of missiles specifically tasked to turn such launch sites into glow-in-the-dark parking lots within the first few minutes of armageddon would be the logical extension of that line of thinking. Of course, knowing that "it was only logical" that they became a target would be a cold comfort indeed to anyone caught nearby if one of those sites did get nuked. It would be interesting to see whether or not messages like this will cause any of the prospective host nations to think twice about letting the US build ABM sites on their soil.



new topics
 
0

log in

join