The Democrats Are Trieing To Eliminate The Border Fence!!!, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 18-12-2007 @ 10:47 PM by rockets red glare
reply to post by HHH Is King



They work everwhere everytime sir. Look at Israel for the most recent example.



reply posted on 19-12-2007 @ 07:56 AM by The Walking Fox
reply to post by rockets red glare



Well, to be honest, you can't claim that a country that refuses to demarcate their borders actually has a "border fence," can you?


reply posted on 19-12-2007 @ 08:03 AM by madnessinmysoul
reply to post by The Walking Fox



O SNAP!

sorry, had to say that because you made such a great point....
and israel doesn't have a "fence" they have a "temporary barrier" which is a big wall.
however, it's not a wall that is stretching anywhere near the length of the american border...


anyway, the idea is stupid, just as the idea of nationalism is stupid in an age where we're connected to the world in the way we are.


reply posted on 19-12-2007 @ 11:35 PM by SpeakerofTruth
reply to post by HHH Is King



I was thinking more along the lines of putting them in holding cells until they could be sent back to wherever they came from, but....


reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 04:52 AM by HHH Is King
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
reply to
post by HHH Is King



I was thinking more along the lines of putting them in holding cells until they could be sent back to wherever they came from, but....


So the next night they attempt to cross again? And repeat until they get lucky and get by? Nope, dead invader is someone not going to attempt to invade again.



reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 01:47 PM by The Walking Fox
reply to post by HHH Is King



Speaking as a Choctaw, can I shoot at white people under your plan? I figure I might as well ask. I know you're all anchor babies, but hey, fair is fair. Right?


reply posted on 22-12-2007 @ 10:03 AM by humanunnaki
reply to post by The Walking Fox



Build a deep wide canal between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans on U.S. land and a solid smooth high cement wall on the north side coming straight out of the water. That'll do it.


reply posted on 22-12-2007 @ 10:34 AM by The Walking Fox
reply to post by humanunnaki



'Cause Mexicans don't know how to use a boat or an airplane, right?

Are you people paying attention? The migrants who walk over the border are the minority. The overwhelming vast majority of them get here through harder-to-prevent ways. Why? Because walking through the freaking desert is a bad idea. I know a lot of posters here apparently think that being born south of the border makes a person slightly below an ape, but it ain't so. They're smart people, just like anyone else, capable of rational, logical thinking, and really damn good planning when they need to.

Personally I think anyone who works as hard to get into the United States and puts up with as much crap when they get here as Latin American migrants do, probably deserve to be here more than most of the people complaining about them.



reply posted on 22-12-2007 @ 11:24 AM by The Walking Fox
reply to post by Animal



Bingo. NAFTA and it's various clones are simply free passes to exploitation of the industrial and agricultural sectors of the countries involved for the enrichment of the elite few within those countries (Who curiously all have mailing addresses in the Cayman islands. Funny, that)

What NAFTA has brought Mexico is gigantic dept, agricultural monopolization and legal hassles (Montsanto's now-famous "sue you for our patented pollen getting into your corn" for instance) and far less rights for workers than they started out with.

Yet for some reason, all Republicans seem to be able to find wrong with Bill Clinton is his party and his penis. Guess screwing over a bunch of other countries for the betterment of America's tax-free caste is acceptable, as compared to sleeping with a Jewish girl.


reply posted on 22-12-2007 @ 11:30 AM by Animal
reply to post by The Walking Fox



right! i admitadly am a progressive liberal. i loved bill clinton when he was in office. sadly i was young and naive. now looking back i have decided i am not down with his policy's. free trade is a economists pipe dream. ricardo's theories on comparative advantage, which free trade is based on, expressly stated such a system would only work as long as money was non-mobile, that is unable to cross a nations boards. that is clearly not the case today.

not to mention the impacts on nations when their traditional subsistence strategies are taken from them. or the impacts of processing and shipping, etc...
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^