Interesting theory. We need to do some homework however. What you have outlined is plausible, but the devil is in the details.
I was actually on the website for the filming simulators you show here some time ago. I found out about them when researching a project. I did not
think to link. Can anyone link that?
Here's what would need to happen. The actual film and set from these simulation setups need be found and linked if possible. They have a limit in
focal, FOV and duration. Those limits, the actual surface relief from the moon also should be superimposed on a lunar map to jibe with any film in
question. We are walking the talk here by doing this. That's real science.
That is not to say that other such sets where not built, but it is less likely as NASA's budget was fairly scrutinized. DOD $ is not out of the
How about these videos (below) of a massive alien ship on the other side of the moon?? Why would a government agency fake these? Show that these
where faked and it is more likely the others could have been too.
By the way, these have not been disproven yet. These should be easier to debunk, but have not proven to be anything but what they look like.
The surface area in question, see videos below, is on the other side of the Moon. I don't think they would have had good enough detailed photos and
relief data to use that surface for the simulation at the time they did this. I believe the sets you show where preparatory for Moon missions, and at
that time good photo topography was scant. So, we need to identify the surface geography (lunography?) and match it to lunar topographic maps. Once
done, a simple comparative can be done.
Alien Ship From Apollo 20
Apollo Flyover & Survey Video
Alien Moon Ship Stills
Then for these videos (and stills) in particular, there needs to be a motive for the hundreds of thousands of dollars such a project would entail to
?? prove ?? aliens had been on the moon?? This needs to be explained. These could have used the same equipment and sets. But from the moon's
non-facing side? Not logical.
These should be easier to prove as fakes. But, seem not to be. So, prove a fake and gain some ground on the rest.
I personally believe that some faking was done to cover mission time where DOD and classified assignments where carried out while Apollo crews where
on the Moon. But, people like Edgar Mitchell and others spending time on the surface whom we would think would talk about, or at least hint on such
have nothing to report. Does not mean it did not happen however.
The missions above (18, 19, and 20) where supposedly launched from Vandenberg secretly after the program was cancelled. I've been to Vandenberg for a
launch and can see how such a massive Saturn V launch could actually be hidden by a night launch. The area is not an easy eye shot from anywhere in
central coastal area, and could be pawned off as a test or satellite mission. I have also seen a couple launches from there from many miles away.
One with my large 17.5" amateur telescope from 50 miles north of the facility, and a night launch from Death Valley I photographed. The DV launch
was announced, so we saw it in the paper when we got to the Furnace Creek store. Otherwise there was no way of knowing "what" was launched.
There are so many chinks in the records that proving anything will take an act of congress to afford it seems. I know I do not have the time and
resources to follow up on more than a comparative for film and record. Who can walk this talk here? I can try and help.