It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Hurry Look At This !!!!!

page: 1
<<   2  3 >>

log in


posted on Dec, 11 2002 @ 04:13 PM
I spotted a Boggy on the Area 51 Rachel Live Cam Now! See it at

[Edited on 09/08/2002 by MountainStar]

[edit on 7-11-2004 by John bull 1]

posted on Dec, 11 2002 @ 04:55 PM
I guess I was too slow. I saw no Boggy.

posted on Dec, 11 2002 @ 05:16 PM
Can you describe exactly what you saw MountainStar?

posted on Dec, 11 2002 @ 05:33 PM
Midnight Mutilator,

It was round and dark in color. It was visible to me approximately 38 minutes. I've got pictures.

I haven't been able to post pictures, for some reason, but I can e-mail them to the ATS. I need an e-mail address though.

posted on Dec, 11 2002 @ 05:37 PM
I was hoping that you took some screen shots or did a save as. Send them them to me I'll host them for a day or two.

posted on Dec, 11 2002 @ 05:43 PM
It looks a little like there are some chemtrails on the screen right now.

[Edited on 11-12-2002 by AZLS1]


posted on Dec, 11 2002 @ 06:52 PM
could also be part of a lens flare from the sun in that one.

posted on Dec, 11 2002 @ 07:07 PM
17:06:03 at Area51 right now

Is it already dark at 5 in Nevada???
It ain't that far up north???
I would expect Washington or Wyoming to be dark at this hour...

posted on Dec, 11 2002 @ 07:46 PM
MountainStar, if you need an email address you can get one at Hotmail or Yahoo. Send them to, I'll put up a page about them on my site and give you full credit for the discovery.

posted on Dec, 11 2002 @ 09:51 PM
TheBandit795 I believe they turn the cameras off at sundown.

Midnight Mutilator did you get my e-mail?

posted on Dec, 11 2002 @ 10:27 PM

Blown up 1,000 %

[edit on 3-7-2008 by William One Sac]

posted on Dec, 11 2002 @ 10:34 PM
Anyone have a clue as to what this is?

I don't see antenne or legs, if it's a bug on the camera lens.

posted on Dec, 11 2002 @ 10:48 PM
The glow around it may just be jpeg artifact. I really dont have a clue. I was wondering perhaps if its a snail, but it doesnt look like it. Also, it was there for over half an hour. It could just be dirt on the lense, however I am not sure why it travelled horizontally across it if that was the case. Unless it is windy there. It also seems to have changed shape between the first two pics. Unless there are more collaborating reports of people seeing an object flying in that vicinity, I would have to hazzard that it is most likely dirt or mud on the lense. In fact, the camera is probably encased in plexiglass, so it could be on the plexiglass.

Thats just a guess though.

[Edited on 12-12-2002 by William One Sac]

posted on Dec, 12 2002 @ 10:00 AM
I was looking at it shortly after she posted, and it just... hung there. So it wasn't a bird or other flying object (my suspicion was bird dropping, actually). When I saw it being removed, I wondered if a human attendant had come in, removed the plexiglass shield, and wiped it clean.

posted on Dec, 12 2002 @ 10:16 AM
I have to agree, it does look like dirt or some other matter. It seems really intense in colour which suggests that it is very close to the camera itself otherwise I would expect the hazing of the atmosphere to wash the colours out, especially at distance. If it was a UFO, I think it was either really really small and close to the camera, or it colour was so intense that hazing had no effect... For the record, I vote dirt or bug that flew into the lens at high speed and mangled itself - hence no legs or antannae

posted on Dec, 12 2002 @ 10:25 AM
Thats sooooo cool.
I'm usually pretty skeptical about UFO photos, but thats definitely ~somthing~
could be dirt or somthing bird poo, I agree about the density of colour but it seems to have moved in a fairly slow horisontal motion.

It can't be someone removing the cover to clean it, I know some pretty dense cleaners but none that would take 30 minutes to do it.

That means whatever it is went away either under its own steam or due to a natural event.

so far the only 3 plausable explanations I can think of are

1: a live creature on the lense.
2: grit that was blown off the lense.
3: a UFO

do we have any more info, description of its movement etc?

posted on Dec, 12 2002 @ 12:29 PM
Here's an e-mail I received today from Cosmic Conspiracies also UFORCE International Director (UK). You might find this interesting.

ive also been watching this cam for several weeks i have also seen this
object on several ocations in not sure what it is it never seems to move
lower in the sky than you have shown also on some pictures there seem to be
a dish appear on the write dont know if you have also seen this

Many Thanks,

Martin at Cosmic Conspiracies

UFORCE International Director(UK)


posted on Dec, 12 2002 @ 01:58 PM
Cut to the chase, guys. They're the one with the camera. They can investigate.

Ask 'em.

posted on Dec, 12 2002 @ 04:28 PM
Yeah I got it Mountain, Thanx!

posted on Dec, 12 2002 @ 05:02 PM
Byrd I don't believe Cosmic Conspiracies owns the Live Cam of Area 51. It say's the Rachel Cam. Now it's NOT working properly today. It's not dark there yet. How do I know? Because they are my neighbors and the sun is still high here! I e-mailed Rachel and haven't heard from them yet.

top topics

<<   2  3 >>

log in