Capital punishment for murder and sex crimes., page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 8-2-2004 @ 01:33 PM by goose
Originally posted by intrepid
Goose, there is only some much work to be done in a jail, and a work range IS a higher static in prison. I know because I work in Corrections. Besides, the individuals would never make it to a normal range, let alone a work range, because they would be attacked by the other inmates. They would be in PC(protective custody) or Segregation. Djarums, I couldn't agree more.


I know there is only so much work in prison thats why I said move a pile of gravel from one spot to another all day long, also I woud assume that if we gave murderers a life sentence wth no parole then they would all be imprisoned together and as I said before if everyone has to work then there is no status for having a job and I don't think standing on your feet 12 hrs. moving gravel would be something anyone would want to do. As for killing sexual predators and all murderers in a world where there is no chance to put an innocent person to death then I would agree, but since we don't live in that world, is it ok to sacrifice a few innocent people(118 we know for sure) to get the guilty,and if it is Ok are you prepared to sacrifice your life or your childs or a family member just so we get the guilty in the process,and of these 118 innocent people murdered by the state, that means 118 guilty people went free. Thats why I say life with no parole, the innocent ones have a chance to prove their innocence and the guilty don't get out on parole to kill again, which is what is currenty happening, I'm also for locking up sexual predators for life.

[Edited on 8-2-2004 by goose]



reply posted on 8-2-2004 @ 04:31 PM by mOjOm
HOMICIDE - MANSLAUGHTER, MURDER
1. A killing, lawful or unlawful, of one human being by another.
2. Unlawful killing with or without intent to kill or do grievous bodily harm.
www.legallawhelp.com...


by Amuk:
I have been in the army and I am a killer.
Does that make me a murderer?
The circumstances should be taken into consideration.

Technically, yes, like even you said yourself, you are a killer/murderer. Under the circumstances you killed as a soldier as an act of War, and as they say, War is Hell. You were trained to kill, ordered to kill, so you killed. Does this make you the same as a Rapist or Child Molester, Definately NOT! Does this make you the same as a psychopath who kills for personal pleasure, NO, of course not. Don't take this the wrong way either, I'm not trying to judge you, I'm just stating the facts. My Grandfather was a soldier, my Father build ICBM's & one of my best friends was a Sniper(a good one at that) and I'd tell them the same thing.

The point is Everyone has their 'Justification' for why they do what they do. But if you agree that 'Killing' is not allowed, then that's it period. Once you open the door to 'Justifying' this reason or that reason why killing is ok, you've put the crack in the dam that will eventually bring down the entire thing. The following was taken from an article with a similar point of view, using Timothy McVeigh as the example.
Death unjustifiable - By Matt Schroeder

It's the question nobody wants to answer: why should we not kill Timothy McVeigh? After all, he killed 168 people, injured several hundred more and traumatized an entire nation. His crimes were horrible, and like most people, I can't even begin to imagine the suffering Oklahoma City went through.

It's been said that executions were made for people like McVeigh, and I've struggled with this a lot, as everyone has. However, putting him to death keeps him from taking responsibility for what he did. It also keeps us from confronting our own problems, and it is going to degrade us all by legitimizing exactly what he bombed a federal building for.

A common justification for the death penalty is that it makes the murderer take responsibility for his actions. I have no idea how...If we really cared about Tim McVeigh's responsibility, we'd keep him alive in prison. We'd make him work, and everything he did for the rest of his life would go toward restitution for the victims' families. Obviously, nothing is going to compensate for the loss of any of the 168 people;

Actually, throwing the power of the state at McVeigh only proves his fears right...After McVeigh, Juan Raul Garza will be the next on June 19. After that, it'll be easier and easier. Why do we tolerate a government with the power to kill its own citizens?

As Albert Camus wrote 44 years ago, "we must proclaim, in our principles and institutions, that the individual is above the state." Camus also said that an execution is like a father killing his wayward son with the lazy words "Really, I didn't know what to do with him."

Like it or not, Timothy McVeigh and his murders are a part of us and killing him keeps us from accepting and understanding that dark side. Surgeons have no right to cover up their botched operations, writes Hugo Adam Bedau, and "the criminologist, like the surgeon, has no right to bury the human consequences of his ignorance, errors and mistakes."

In the end, we're fooling ourselves if we think this execution will place responsibility on anyone, increase respect for law and order or cover up all the hatred we contain. Humans are not pinnacles of virtue, and we have no right to declare anyone unworthy of life. We can't be the virtuous assassins we want to be. Revenge is no principle to found a government upon, least of all a government with the power of death; just ask Bud Welch, who lost his daughter Julie in the bombing but opposes McVeigh's execution.
flathat.wm.edu...


Don't take this as me being soft on criminals such as Sexual Offenders. Current prison conditions are way to soft for violent offenders. Repeat offenders are also proof of a system that has failed. Once you are convicted of a violent crime, getting released again should be practically unheard of. When convicted and given Life+ without possibility of ever getting out, I'm talkin' serious lock down and minimal provisions, most of which the prisoners themselves are made to provide for themselves. Anything extra goes to 'Pay Back' victims or society at large. Basically take them back to living in the 1500's, and living under a militant authority.


reply posted on 8-2-2004 @ 06:40 PM by mOjOm
Originally posted by ihatethisplace
what about that guy who just raped and killed that 11 year old girl? he should be put to death. i am to young to have kids but im sure anyone here with kids would agree the only thing to do for him is execute him, and not even that will do. rapists should be given the death penalty. most of the people who are raped never recover fully and are mentally scared. i think its just as bad to see somebody you love rot from the inside from being raped, than it is to see someone you love murdered. i think the only acceptable punishment for murderers and rapists is execution. i can understand all other types of crime but not those two.


That is simply because Execution is the simplest answer, not because it's the only thing to do. The guy you're talking about shouldn't get off that easy. Killing him for the abuse and loss of life he has caused, like you said yourself, will not be 'made up' by killing him. In fact I would say that He could NEVER 'pay back' for what he's done. But instead of simply killing him, why not allow him to live and make him try and give back something every second of the rest of his life. Force him to take responsibility for what he's done. Either way, it will never make what he did ok again. Killing him back doesn't help anything either, and allows the Government/State the ability to Kill People. Keeping him locked up and forcing him to work in some way for the rest of his life atleast makes him accountable for something.


reply posted on 8-2-2004 @ 07:17 PM by mOjOm
Ok, I see what you're saying. Let's first of all, take personal feelings out of the way and look at it from sort of a 3rd party non-bias perspective.

Let's deal with just killing for now also to keep it simple. Murder of another person is agreed to be wrong, illegal, etc. That goes for anyone for any reason. If you get pissed at your cheating wife, a degenerate low life, a corrupt business partner, a lying government official or you're just a sick-o, and kill, you're guilty, done deal.

Now, once totally removed from Society, that person is no longer able to continue killing, so regardless of what they've done, they are now stopped from doing it ever again. Now, on one hand you can kill them back. This does nothing for the actual victim(obviously they are dead) or the victims families, friends, etc. The arguement of "making sure that nobody else is harmed" has already been taken care of, so all that would be accomplished by execution is giving others a chance to witness an execution take place. Also you've now just made 'Killing', which is supposed to be wrong/illegal, justifiable under certain conditions and given the State/Federal Government the ability to kill others as well. (It's no wonder that the Government uses Fear and Tactics against it's own people now is it. Every time they do it, all the people tell the Government to now Go Kill cause we want Revenge, which is what they want to do anyway. Think about it!!)

Or you could keep the person alive, live in conditions similar to a military work camp in mideval time era and force them to DO SOMETHING to benifit either the victims families or society at large. That includes doing whatever is needed to produce his own food, etc.

Think about it. If you killed someone and faced either 'execution' or the rest of your life, every day, living as a caged animal, working as a slave, until you finally died, which would you choose?? Which would help keep you from commiting the crime in the first place??


reply posted on 8-2-2004 @ 07:29 PM by mOjOm
Originally posted by intrepid
Well we've heard from a younger person, and that would be a feeling of greater security if a rapist didn't breath. The point just doesn't seem to be getting through. These people can't be rehabilitated. You're talking about them paying, suffering, in jail? Jesus, I have to worry about bills,weather to get to work, whether I will be able to provide for my kids tomorrow if I get hurt, etc.. They have no worries. Food, shelter & cable T.V. is provided. The cost of a CP trial is high, but $200/day to keep this scum adds up to. Thats $67,000/year to keep one. Translate that to even 20 years, and that makes the trial a bargain sale.


You're assuming too much. Don't put words into what is being said than anyone is saying. I'm not saying jail as in Cable TV and Weightlifting, etc. If you would read my posts you'd see what I'm saying. Another thing is complaining about how much $$ it costs is all misinformation and bad judgement too, let me explain. First you are attempting to equate Human Life to a monitary Value, regardless of them being criminal or not, it all starts somewhere. Second, all that crap about how much it costs to feed them and stuff is all LIES, cause all that money goes into the pocket of Officials who run the prisons, or Political Members who made it possible. Think about it, all these "Save the Children" shows on TV are able to Feed, Shelter, Teach, etc. kids for like .60 cents a day. How is that possible yet it costs something like $500 a day or whatever for a prisoner. Cause some of it is pocketed, and the rest is wasted on computers and basketball courts and tv's and crap for those who don't deserve it.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 12 days ago with 59 member flags
The CIA in Australia: America\'s Foreign Watergate
  Posted 2 days ago with 19 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 12 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 10 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 11 days ago with 10 member flags