It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"I think Democrats are damn fools for not coming on Fox News," Wallace said in an interview with The Politico.
While Democratic presidential candidates Hillary Clinton, Chris Dodd, Joe Biden, and Bill Richardson have agreed to be interviewed by Wallace, Barack Obama and John Edwards have declined.
Also, the Democratic candidates will not take part in any Fox News-sponsored debates. Wallace has moderated three Republicans debates this year.
"Just imagine if the Republicans, under pressure from right-to-life groups, refused to appear on CNN or MSNBC," Wallace told The Politico.
Originally posted by The Walking Fox
Give John Edwards twenty minutes on prime-time Fox, and watch the nation turn deep blue overnight.
Originally posted by HHH Is King
People who watch Fox Noise believe Bush actually won Florida even though all counts said Gore won. In fact the only reason Florida was a debate was because GWB's cousin at Fox Noise gave Bush Florida before counts were in.
Originally posted by HHH Is King
Um, for people who think Fox Noise is News...
People who watch Fox Noise believe Saddam attacked us on 9/11 even though no Iraqis were involved.
Originally posted by The Walking Fox
John Edwards, like these other guys, charges for his speeches. I do not think that he was asking poor people to foot the bill, do you? That you expect him to "defend" what is in fact common practice that goes uncriticized from your own team, kinda lends credence to what I said about hte pointlessness of trying to go on Fox News.
Originally posted by jsobecky
I think it is more likely that Democrats are afraid of discussing their positions.
They have been pandering to the lunatic fringe for so long that no matter how much they now want to appear moderate, they must answer up for their past sins.
To have to defend their actions would be embarassing at the least. Best for them to hide, as they have been doing all along.
Originally posted by The Walking Fox
reply to post by jsobecky
Well, no. You did read the article right? The fee was covered partially by sponsors, and by ticket sales. There were about 1,770 people in attendance - if they had footed the entire bill, it would have come out to $31 per head. That's pretty darn good rates.
Expecting a speaker to speak about poverty for free is like expecting him to give his house to charity before speaking of homelessness
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by madnessinmysoul
To have to defend their actions would be embarassing at the least. Best for them to hide, as they have been doing all along.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
Originally posted by jsobecky
I think it is more likely that Democrats are afraid of discussing their positions.
really? i've seen them doing plenty of that
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
lunatic fringe? spare me the o'reilly talking points.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
they haven't been hiding, they've been discussing in forums where people won't be predisposed to bias against them.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Name 3 important pieces of legislation they've passed since they assumed the majority.
They have truly earned the nickname of "The Do Nothing Congress".
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
Of course you don't want to hear the truth. Just look at their chairman of the DNC - Howard Dean.
They are toning down their plans to make the US a socialistic society, at least until the election is over.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
Their entire platform for the past seven years has been to Blame Bush for everything.
They campaigned to eliminate the Washington "Culture of Corruption" when they have been the most corrupt group in history.
Their ranks are riddled with alcoholics and drug addicts.
They are pathetic.:shk: